TIMELINE:
Application to vary Aug 2011
We had court to vary support in Oct 2012.
Decision was Nov 2012.
Cost endorsement was Apr 2013.
This was a 21 month ordeal
Question: Was there a case conference or any "conference" between bringing forward the Application (Form 15) to vary child support and October of 2012?
My question is, "When can either party return to court to vary support again"?
When there is a material change in circumstance. (Loss of employment, or a significant change in income, etc...)
The judge in this case let the old order stay in effect for 1 year after the order despite the obvious change in circumstances.....100+ k to no job.
I don't understand what you mean by this ^^^ statement. Could you please clarify.
If I get work and get taken back to court I will lose my job. No doubt in my mind. Negotiation only works when 2 parties are sincerely interested in peace and possess a "pinch" of fairness.
Well, a better pattern to follow which is what the court expects of all litigants is to leverage Rule 18 of the Family Law Rules. ("Offer to Settle") And to do this PROPERLY.
Prior to either you or the other party bringing an Application (Form 15) you should be serving a comprehensive and detailed offer to settle in accordance with Rule 18.
Why do this you may ask?
Simple. Once an Application is made the matter has to go to a "Case Conference" prior to hearing on a motion. This is a mediated opportunity with a judge to settle matters or move them forward.
One thing you can do and is requested of you as a litigant is to attach to your "Case Conference Brief" is any offers to settle you have made with regards to the matter.
Bingo. You can attach the already and outstanding offer to settle. It actually gives the justice something to work with. If the other party is high conflict, their brief will more than likely be a multi-page nightmare of allegations that can't be addressed at a conference. You will easily demonstrate, if your offer is reasonable, who the highly conflicted party is. No matter how much they put into their Case Conference Brief about how awful and "cheap" you are.
The judge will then, as required, tell the parties who they would rule if the matter was before them on motion. Listen to this carefully. Take notes!
If the matter isn't settled as a result first request from you should be a "Settlement Conference" be scheduled and endorsed next. Failing this and the justice moves matters to a motion, request that the motion be made preemptive on both parties. Then request that the costs for the Case Conference be endorsed and to be determined by the motions judge.
You want to avoid going back to court. Be reasonable, make a solid offer to settle and do it before the explosion happens.
If you are being reasonable and the other party is not it will possibly end at a case conference if the offer is not accepted. If the other party is being unreasonable then you have a standing offer that can be used to determine costs against the other party. (That is under the assumption you are being reasonable.)
Many people do not leverage Rule 18 in a positive way. It is unfortunate as it can often curb a matter from going into meltdown.
Remember, costs can be calculated to the date of service on the offer to settle. Also remember to always ask for costs when going before a judge.
Good Luck!
Tayken