Janus
New member
what we need to do is what I did. withdraw from FRO and never agree to use FRO.
For obvious reasons, you only need one party to consent to the use of FRO. Otherwise, almost no payors would ever consent to use it.
what we need to do is what I did. withdraw from FRO and never agree to use FRO.
For obvious reasons, you only need one party to consent to the use of FRO. Otherwise, almost no payors would ever consent to use it.
if ex wants to move forward to a hearing on the sole issue of whether or not it should be enforced through FRO.. let them be your guest.
e-transfers are my new FRO once I am working again
EX won't find a lawyer to file a motion for it just to be enforced through FRO.
Heck she couldn't even find a lawyer to help her try and prove me intentionally unemployed after her 2nd lawyer canned her.
Assuming recipient agrees, any form of payment works. If recipient does not agree, she can ask FRO to enforce and your etransfers will now go to FRO instead of directly to the recipient
At some point in time your ex should lose her drivers' license and passport. Then you might see some activity.
If your ex has never worked then she won't get CPP.
People like your ex are drag on society. Keep tabs on her though - she's likely to work under-the-table at some point and bank accounts can be garnished. Ask FRO when they go after the drivers' license. If she doesn't work she doesn't need one.
Usually one of the first things maintenance enforcement agencies put into place is a personal property registry. Make sure that is on file. Ex buys a car and then tries to dispose of it... it can be payday for you.
You never know. People get lazy and complacent. Tax return refunds and provincial tax incentives. You won't get rich but can be assured she will be pissed that she doesn't get it.
I don't get these people who have kids and then don't contribute to their upbringing.
Ex buys a car and then tries to dispose of it... it can be payday for you.
Because it doesn't suit you and your agenda. Like a lot of mothers (thank G-d not all) you like your gravy train.Just went back and had another look - one of the determinants that this "study" uses to make its Fair/Unfair assessment is, "Does the child result in a financial profit or loss to the parent?"
I am sorry I cannot take this seriously at ALL.