spousal support - reasonable position

this is a good argument right here. but suing her would lead nowhere most civil suits for these kind of things get thrown out.
Keep telling yourself this, and then keep complaining that you get no protection from the courts.

File for a restraining order based on physical harrassment at your place of work that threatens your employment. There is no reason why this should not be issued.
 
Keep telling yourself this, and then keep complaining that you get no protection from the courts.

File for a restraining order based on physical harrassment at your place of work that threatens your employment. There is no reason why this should not be issued.
would that be covered under bill 168???
 
Keep telling yourself this, and then keep complaining that you get no protection from the courts.

File for a restraining order based on physical harrassment at your place of work that threatens your employment. There is no reason why this should not be issued.

Actually this suing part I state based on experience, I had digital evidence of libel i.e. email, I had digital evidence of allegations of assault being false i.e. video of where i was & email plus the accuser on tape stating "my fault was i didnt make a good story" despite such compelling evidence and much more, on the first case conference the judged bullied me to have my case withdrawn. here is how she did it.

While she agreed on principal that my claim had its merits and I could prove that the accuser had malicious intent in "some" of her actions, i should withdraw the case because
1- its not in the best interest of the child. i.e. emotional blackmail
2- if i dont withdraw she will give a restraining order against me (this is something even the accuser did not request originally!) (judicial bullying)
3- the accuser has no job, so even if i win, i wont get a dime. (likely true)

I was shocked at the restraining order threat, the judge sent me outside to think about it for 5 minutes, I went out to think about it and realized the judge's strategy. i.e. restraining order results in
1- future prejudice against me in the case, specially because the next judge will consider that despite the applicant not asking for a restraining order the judge ordered it, i must be very dangerous person;
2- no direct or indirect communication except through counsel, she knew I had no job and cannot afford counsel, legal aid wont be given because its a divorce case, hence since we cannot exchange affidavits & so on, i will have no option but to withdraw the case.

quite frankly i was intimidated and shaken by the judge's bullying and realized the above and thus agreed to withdraw my claim. this resulted in no restraining order, i.e. if i was dangerous the judge should have given a restraining order despite me withdrawing my claim, thereby verifying my thesis of judicial bullying.
 
Last edited:
sahibjee

Please don't get me wrong, this is just an on-the-side comment, but in reading your posts here, I get the impression that you are obsessing with each and every detail of your dispute with your ex. This can't be very good for your health?

You do realize that there is only so much that you can expect from the courts, and although you want justice (as we all do) you cannot control every little thing. May I suggest a hobby, fishing, yoga, art classes, something relaxing?

I do hope that things work out for you :)
 
sahibjee

Please don't get me wrong, this is just an on-the-side comment, but in reading your posts here, I get the impression that you are obsessing with each and every detail of your dispute with your ex. This can't be very good for your health?

You do realize that there is only so much that you can expect from the courts, and although you want justice (as we all do) you cannot control every little thing. May I suggest a hobby, fishing, yoga, art classes, something relaxing?

I do hope that things work out for you :)

Thank you very much for your care Janibel, hopefully once my case is resolved i will be able to make more positive contributions to the forums. :-)
 
Not to worry - divorce has some weird side-effects and makes even the sanest person feel like the sky is falling! It does get better, one day at a time. Don't let it consume you :)
 
How is this even useful? Waste of post space for someone needing advice.

It's called humour. Laughter does wonders for your health.

It has been suggested to you a number of times, that you put Tayken on your ignore list, since you seem to be unable to resist snarking at his every post. Perhaps if you are unable to see the posts, it will be easier for you to restrain yourself?
 
It's called humour. Laughter does wonders for your health.

It has been suggested to you a number of times, that you put Tayken on your ignore list, since you seem to be unable to resist snarking at his every post. Perhaps if you are unable to see the posts, it will be easier for you to restrain yourself?

Since that post was five days ago, I fail to see how bringing it up now is helpful either but since you seem to want a response, here it is.

This overgeneralization of me "snarking at his every post" is absurd. Quite frankly if I responded to every post of his, I would be a very busy woman indeed. Since some here love research, here are the numbers. His stats say he posts five times a day on average. I am at 1.8. Statistically impossible that I snark every post.

What is amazing is how many times he has replied to my own posts where the topic has nothing to do with him. Simply because he is passive aggressive with his expert subtle jabs does not mean they do not exist. I ignore many of Tayken's posts that I find ludicrous. The ones I comment on do not call names and have not been edited lately.

I see others are finally calling him on his exaggerations too.

C'est la vie.
 
Last edited:
Since that post was five days ago, I fail to see how bringing it up now is helpful either but since you seem to want a response, here it is.

And this overgeneralization of me "snarking at his every post" is absurd. Quite frankly if I responded to every post of his, I would be a very busy woman indeed. Since some here love research, here are the numbers. His stats say he posts five times a day on average. I am at 1.8. Statistically impossible that I snark every post.

What is amazing is how many times he has replied to my own posts where the topic has nothing to do with him. Simply because he is passive aggressive with his expert subtle jabs does not mean they do not exist. I ignore many of Tayken's posts that I find ludicrous. The ones I comment on do not call names and have not been edited lately.

I see others are finally calling him on his exaggerations too.

C'est la vie.

It may have been made five days ago, but I don't live on here and open every post every day. I'm quite busy.

No response was needed or required - the question was rhetorical. You've been asked numerous times to do something about your issue on your own, if you can't, it can be done for you.

Back to the thread topic....
 
It may have been made five days ago, but I don't live on here and open every post every day. I'm quite busy.

No response was needed or required - the question was rhetorical. You've been asked numerous times to do something about your issue on your own, if you can't, it can be done for you.

Back to the thread topic....

Oh my goodness....Blink, there was no "issue". Stop being patronizing.

Tayken has written many times openly that he feels that I contribute nothing to the board. I was simply pointing out to him that sometimes his posts may not contribute either. What I posted was not contrary to board rules in any form.

I feel like there was no need for you to bring this up. There was no need to comment. There was no need to say it was an "issue" when it was only two lines. You can try all you want to keep identifying me as having some sort of "issue" but I would say, in this case, you are making a mountain out of a molehill.
 
It may have been made five days ago, but I don't live on here and open every post every day. I'm quite busy.


Back to the thread topic....

No you may not have but Mess has been here and he did not find issue with it. He is quite comfortable editing me if needed.

He read it and moved on.

Hopefully you can too now.
 
Oh my goodness....Blink, there was no "issue". Stop being patronizing.

Tayken has written many times openly that he feels that I contribute nothing to the board. I was simply pointing out to him that sometimes his posts may not contribute either. What I posted was not contrary to board rules in any form.

I feel like there was no need for you to bring this up. There was no need to comment. There was no need to say it was an "issue" when it was only two lines. You can try all you want to keep identifying me as having some sort of "issue" but I would say, in this case, you are making a mountain out of a molehill.

No you may not have but Mess has been here and he did not find issue with it. He is quite comfortable editing me if needed.

He read it and moved on.

Hopefully you can too now.

http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f8/message-board-rules-12642/

"Trolling
Trolling means you're not posting to actually start or participate in a good discussion, but simply to anger another member or group of members. Posting in order to bait other users will not be tolerated."


If you have an issue with a post, use the report button. Posting simply to make it known you dislike a poster or their post, especially when there is nothing wrong with it aside from that you dislike the poster, is trolling.

If you have any further issue with the moderation, a specific poster or myself, use the report button or take it to private message. Period.

Now....about that Spousal Support....
 
Back
Top