Sexual letters & Factual Errors

Status
Not open for further replies.
hahahahahaha @ the posts on this thread.

You know...I bet the members of this board could make a WHOLE lot of money publishing a compiled list of the funniest crap in our opposing affidavits.

I say we make a website...funniestdivorceallegations.com . We can have a separate tab for these letters...they're a great help to newly separated people spending nights alone....who need some steamy reading.
 
Pursuinghappiness said:
hahahahahaha @ the posts on this thread.

You know...I bet the members of this board could make a WHOLE lot of money publishing a compiled list of the funniest crap in our opposing affidavits.

I say we make a website...funniestdivorceallegations.com . We can have a separate tab for these letters...they're a great help to newly separated people spending nights alone....who need some steamy reading.
Click to expand...

I don't disagree at all. The irrelevant matters that a highly conflicted litigant brings forward is quite funny. The fact that judges don't do more about it and the legal system as a whole is concerning. You would think solicitors have an obligation to make sure stupidity doesn't get into affidavit material... It still does.

My favourite stupidity in affidavits is utterances of Satanism. This just demonstrates the extreme irrationality of the person who even puts this to an affidavit. (Yes this does happen.)

If the word "satanist" or "satan" appears in an affidavit it should be an automatic tell-tail sign of who the delusional party is in the litigation. Anyone who would bring satan or satanism into their divorce surely suffers from an Axis II disorder of the personality. Generally Cluster C "anxious types" do this.

The amount of "anxious parents" going before the court requires serious investigation. Overanxious parents are generally "over anxious" people. Generally anxiety disorders are driving the illogical statements. How someone could commit something so "shocking" to an affidavit is beyond me. How a lawyer would let it fly is in my opinion very "concerning" and reflective of the enormous problem in the legal profession as a whole.

The legal system needs to do more to stop/curb the stupidity found before the family courts. It is wasting everyone's time.

More concerning are the "Custody and Access" professionals out there who turn a blind eye to this when doing evaluations. Especially those who are registered clinicians.

Good Luck!
Tayken
 
This thread's title is just well perfect! Just in case nobody here remembered the $14,000 Frenchman..... can I please be at least PM'd the sex stuff cuz its been so long I forgot!!! But serious now, after accepting that I negligent for requiring knee surgery, neck, a couple of kidneys after one or two too many back rebuilds and if I stop taking so many pain pills for pain I should be able to go back to work "in welding, heavy construction, roofing, mechanics, electrical or plumbing" - because I am good with my hands. (maybe I think she forgot my other talent....brain surgery)

Her, her lawyer, both? - I do not make enough on disability so they feel that if I stop spending money on those pain medications it is fair to increase my income to an extra $700. They wish to retract their first request that my child support payments to her be doubled from the tabled amount for CS be removed for (sorry they discovered that a table amount of NIL equals NIL so that idea didn't work!!) So their new idea is that whatever SS she be forced to pay, that this amount be added to the too low disability income that I do get and by doing so they hope to recoup the majority of SS she does pay out when this new higher figure is used to calculate the CS. (It will hurt my wife so much that my adult children recieve their CS direct as part of my disability program at a rate of 8 times over my table amount as long as they continue to go to school or turn 25).

I will close this off with their final observation that "if I didn't work so hard to support my family for 20 + years she wouldn't now be faced having to begin taking care of it herself"...... (ok, I made that last part up but.....) she wouldn't have been faced with being accused of no less than shifting money thru no less than 32 accounts so my last "factural Error" I shall..... Her last fact is they are now requesting extra costs for my unduly complicating this divorce by requesting the return of the retirement funds, Inheritance and.....more that the bank has verified and that I am frankly Bizarre for trying!!!! I know I am lost of things but to begin "name calling" so early in the process??

Thanks for giving me this slot to let some of this out ;);)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top