Royal Road To Trial

Oh and your getting the sweetened version around the car. The filtered and massaged message.

Maybe Goldilocks got a impaired driving charge or already had a car accident.

all you know is "car trouble"

So your basically informed..I guess
 
MrToronto said:
Oh and your getting the sweetened version around the car. The filtered and massaged message.

Maybe Goldilocks got a impaired driving charge or already had a car accident.

all you know is "car trouble"

So your basically informed..I guess
Click to expand...
WHAAA!! I never thought of that. She could have been in an accident for sure. Funny, in court she complained about my license plate sticker (and it wasnt even due until the end of the month). I truly hope she doesnt decide to drive it home tonight .. (and she will Im sure).

So what's "car trouble". I wonder if D4 will come home saying something.
 
MrToronto said:
I have no idea how a welfare recipient can own/operate a vehicle and afford proper insurance....a car costs 5k a year to run....without daily trips to Labelle

So you have every right to be concerned.....but there is nothing you can do about it.

Was the car claimed in her FORM 13 financials...we keep bothering you to get?

she says here her car is broke(r)

I think Arabian wrote earlier the old goat will run out of money...maybe she has
Click to expand...
I remember she claimed the car in her initial reply with a "?" beside amount.

I dont have her current FORM 13 .. and trust me its not from my lack of asking my lawyer about it. My lawyer simply hasn't done that part.

I have no clue how a welfare recipient affords all of this plus weekly trips to QC and back either ... then shows up in court crying about how poor she is.

She is very money motivated. When she abducted D4, 4/7 items in her reply were financial stuff.
 
You had better believe that if you indicated you had car trouble she would likely have CAS at your doorstep.

Yes what did happened with financial disclosure? I would hazard a guess that there was none because if she were to disclose she would lose her social assistance benefits? I believe social assistance gives a nominal amount of money for public transportation but that probably does not amount to more than 100.00 per month.
 
getting her punted off of welfare would likely speed up settlement as your ex-MIL would be footing the entire legal cost. I'd therefore make it a high priority item.

Once the welfare strings are cut she would be required to come up with a substantial retainer, probably even if she retained her current counsel.

Would be sweet to see you get costs awarded against her. As long as she is on welfare that is not too likely to happen would it? I know there is some case law but I do not think it is too common. Better the MIL pay for her involvement and for encouraging this matter to go as far as it has.
 
Last edited:
makes her look petty. I don't know how car registration (having current or not having current) is of any concern to her. If you didn't have up-to-date registration you would get a fine. It is not a safety issue.

Good taxpayers of Ontario are paying for this nonsense. Crying shame really.
 
LovingFather32 said:
WHAAA!! I never thought of that. She could have been in an accident for sure. Funny, in court she complained about my license plate sticker (and it wasnt even due until the end of the month). I truly hope she doesnt decide to drive it home tonight .. (and she will Im sure).

So what's "car trouble". I wonder if D4 will come home saying something.
Click to expand...

Try not to give yourself more catastrophic things to worry about. "Car trouble" could be anything from the A/C or turn signals not working to a complete writeoff. And the first kind of car trouble (minor) is much more common than the second (major). Do you have any reason to think she's been in an accident with Kid in the car? Does she have a history of dangerous driving? If not, don't let your imagination run away with you.
 
I get a full 8 days with D4 tomorrow. Can't wait. A long way from 3 months of denied access followed by 3 hours/week.

I have tons of fun stuff in store.

I look forward to her reply on arbitration/med-arb/collaborative law. I will exhaust every tool and option available to try and settle this in the absence of a trial.

It would be great if she suddenly decided to be reasonable and at least explore other options. I'd like to put money towards D4's education ... not the lawyers' children's education.
 
Last edited:
Have fun for ur time with D4 ....you'll get squat for resolving this it's for a Judge not Goldilocks

You missed one.....for a Judge to seize the file

WHAT!.....there are no reasons for a Trial...your EX is fixated on a drug/drinking new life in Quebec.

I look at the upcoming SC...not only for a OCL update (probably won't be ready) but to show OP there case has vaporized and maybe one Judge should take it the rest of the way.

Trial is pretty serious....I doubt LAO scumbag has enough questions to make DAD look like a unfit parent (already has lots of access)

the flipside is Goldilocks is hell bent on Quebec...and will do anything to get there.

it's pretty obvious, what's going on....maybe the SC Judge will end it
 
Yes you could go for a summary judgement...less penalties now.

What is the genuine issue for trial?

Question to opposing lawyer: do you have enough credible evidence for "this" to even be trial worthy?

The question is what is "this". I forget all the details of your case but if it's not financial and just about custody then...does she have anything to pin on you? Nope.
 
A judge seizing the file would probably be advantageous for sure.

But check this out. Our subsequent SC is being held by the same judge as our previous SC. In this motion ex put words in her mouth .. by accident?

Ex said that last SC was adjourned because D4 was having behavior issues. When in fact it was adjourned because not enough time had elapsed since the Motion.

I'm sure the judge won't appreciate her misinterpretation of why the SC was adjourned. Ex also said that she found it disturbing that I would now say there are no behaviors because she says in the SC I said there were behaviors. All I said was that the behaviors resembled that of a typical 3 year old.

In any case .. all I can focus on right now seems to be the updated OCL report.

What OP have on me you ask? They seem to be good at manufacturing and inventing they're own stuff.. and biasing ppl around them with it (even though the courts won't even accept it).

Thus ... disclosure was a hallmark of my first few threads here...and it will come up again. Why do I not have full disclosure yet? It's been asked for over and over. Why are we not narrowing the issues?

Substance abuse .... hair follicle .. urinalysis, blood tests from family Dr. This hasn't been mentioned in last motion in her materials. Does this mean it's dropped? Doubt it. Next OCL will probably be fed the same bull.

Abuse... no criminal record, motion judge threw out, OP story keeps changing, OP stayed for 9 months recording ... OP asked for a restraining order in her reply but never followed up on it ... why?

I need disclosure. And you can't just get software and edit recordings to suit your case and rely on that for custody. Has to be verified by s court reporter (authenticity, etc). There's just more to it.

Will SC judge end it? Honestly.... I think a lot depends on the ocl report. It better be just an "update" and not just a rehash of mud slinging. I just wish my little girl could catch a break from all this questioning ... Christ...she's only 4. Give her a break already.
 
Last edited:
Having the most AMAZING week with D4. Went fishing, they went to the zoo, fairs, beach .. you name it. Tomorrow we're going to a campground/water park for the weekend. I can hardly wait!

She's the happiest little girl I've ever seen. I love being a dad!!
 
Maybe.

But he says he got d4 on the 20th.

Hard to believe he crammed in the beach, the zoo, fairs, fishing and "you name it" into three days already.

No wonder the poor child is tired.
 
Ah Paris. ..when you quote irrational posters who have no advice .. I have to read it.

BTW ... they..as in ...the sisters. Yes we took them. We...being the parents. Geez...just waiting to pounce or what?

Believe it or not S&T... blended families do in fact exist.

Thanks for the unnecessary false assumptions though.
 
Last edited:
To be clear regarding some false assumptions. We are lucky enough to live 6 minutes from a nice beach .. which I know a nice fishing hole in.

So we could do all this in 1 day .. not even. Nice relaxed evening and in bed early. Only to be up at 7:00am .. full of energy! Not overdoing it with a child is pretty common sense parenting. Kids can attend daily events without overdoing it. It's all about structure, moderation, etc.

I gave the girls their first lesson on worms when fishing. The "ewww" look on their face was priceless. I taught D4 how to reel in .. I thought she caught something at one point but it turned out to be a crayfish. Long story short .. 2 new proud fisherwomen were born today.

These things are what vacations are all about. Our family is creating amazing memories.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top