Hi,
I'm having issues with the FRO with enforcement of S.7. Expenses.
I (father) have joint custody / joint time sharing for my 22 year old, who is attending university out of town. He is completing his 4 year and expected to graduate in April 2026. Hi is in Coop and hasn't returned outside of short visits between coop placements.
I had to take my ex to court as she was unwilling to adjust child support or pay/contribute for any section 7 expenses whatsoever. This resulted in my paying big offset CS (she doesn't work) when CS wasn't owed and paying 100% of the post-secondary costs for over 2.5 years until the mater was resolved. This has largely been corrected, and the court action resulted in 3 Support Deduction Orders (SDOs).
Can this be true, is this accurate? The agent is spoke with at the FRO insisted that I had to go back to court (what is the point if they won't enforce)
Looking for advice.
Thanks,
P.S. Mom really takes issue with reimbursing my expenses and would rather pay the child (ironic since she collects child support directly). To reduce conflict, she pays the child her portion of the expenses and I do the same. She's stated that she will no longer support the child, but this gives me no remedy if FRO won't enforce and I'll either have to watch my son drop out of university or repeat this exercise. The judge was not very sympathetic to the situation and took no issues with Mom's refusal to pay expenses until the eve of the court date 2+ years after the child started university.
I'm having issues with the FRO with enforcement of S.7. Expenses.
I (father) have joint custody / joint time sharing for my 22 year old, who is attending university out of town. He is completing his 4 year and expected to graduate in April 2026. Hi is in Coop and hasn't returned outside of short visits between coop placements.
I had to take my ex to court as she was unwilling to adjust child support or pay/contribute for any section 7 expenses whatsoever. This resulted in my paying big offset CS (she doesn't work) when CS wasn't owed and paying 100% of the post-secondary costs for over 2.5 years until the mater was resolved. This has largely been corrected, and the court action resulted in 3 Support Deduction Orders (SDOs).
- SDO 1. Father to pay CS when child was not in school (as defined by mother) as well as S7
- SDO 2. Mother to pay S7 expenses to father
- SDO 3. Mother to pay Costs
Can this be true, is this accurate? The agent is spoke with at the FRO insisted that I had to go back to court (what is the point if they won't enforce)
Looking for advice.
Thanks,
P.S. Mom really takes issue with reimbursing my expenses and would rather pay the child (ironic since she collects child support directly). To reduce conflict, she pays the child her portion of the expenses and I do the same. She's stated that she will no longer support the child, but this gives me no remedy if FRO won't enforce and I'll either have to watch my son drop out of university or repeat this exercise. The judge was not very sympathetic to the situation and took no issues with Mom's refusal to pay expenses until the eve of the court date 2+ years after the child started university.