representingself
New member
After a year and a half and 4 case conferences, I was finally able to convince Judge to allow me to proceed to a Motion on my application for a retroactive child support adjustment.
The Judge was reluctant because he felt that the amount I have requested should be negotiated and settled upon. Alas, Mr. Respondent refuses to communicate with me, so off we go to a Motion.
To date, I have had the same Judge at every court appearance.... and he has yet to thoroughly read a single document, or review any evidence submitted. It seems he barely skims over the brief to get the "jist"of the case....
I am hoping that a Motion Judge will be more thorough and review the submissions/affidavits... but I have no idea?
I've never done this before.
I have decided to focus solely on the matter of retroactive support, and forego all other issues for subsequent motions (if he continues to refuse communication)..
After hearing submissions from both parties.....if the Judge happens to determine that a retroactive adjustment is justified, can he/she make a final ruling?
The Judge was reluctant because he felt that the amount I have requested should be negotiated and settled upon. Alas, Mr. Respondent refuses to communicate with me, so off we go to a Motion.
To date, I have had the same Judge at every court appearance.... and he has yet to thoroughly read a single document, or review any evidence submitted. It seems he barely skims over the brief to get the "jist"of the case....
I am hoping that a Motion Judge will be more thorough and review the submissions/affidavits... but I have no idea?
I've never done this before.I have decided to focus solely on the matter of retroactive support, and forego all other issues for subsequent motions (if he continues to refuse communication)..
After hearing submissions from both parties.....if the Judge happens to determine that a retroactive adjustment is justified, can he/she make a final ruling?
