See my partner has a list of items in his agreement for the year the divorce was signed. Since then the ex has made comments about how the kids didnt do that stuff the next year so he has to pay for whatever she wants. Her attitude is that list constitutes money he has to pay so she will get it in other ways. Not the case. Since then its been a battle of what she thinks is covered and what he says is CS. Things like school trips, application fees, dances, dresses etc. he just got the medicines and tampons demand.
Im agreeing that if OP doesnt think its legit he needs to speak up now. Kids grow up and out of different activities. Theres also legit expenses that should be covered. If his ex wants to play the "hide the kids because daddy is a monster game" then thats a separate issue that needs to be dealt with.
As my partners lawyer explained, s7 are never clear, you have to look at each persons income, the reasonableness of the expense and whether or not you could afford it while married. The problem was, his ex put them in serious debt signing the kids up willy nilly when married. The divorce gave him the freedom to say no to something he knew they couldnt afford. She said yes anyway and then the kids got involved because dad was a cheapskate jerk.
Im agreeing that if OP doesnt think its legit he needs to speak up now. Kids grow up and out of different activities. Theres also legit expenses that should be covered. If his ex wants to play the "hide the kids because daddy is a monster game" then thats a separate issue that needs to be dealt with.
As my partners lawyer explained, s7 are never clear, you have to look at each persons income, the reasonableness of the expense and whether or not you could afford it while married. The problem was, his ex put them in serious debt signing the kids up willy nilly when married. The divorce gave him the freedom to say no to something he knew they couldnt afford. She said yes anyway and then the kids got involved because dad was a cheapskate jerk.