Making sure im on the right path.

hadenough said:
If there's a tribe or a cult that I can join to get me out of the $$ crap I'm in - lol could someone please tell me where to enlist?
Click to expand...

Cult | Define Cult at Dictionary.com

1. a particular system of religious worship, especially with reference to its rites and ceremonies.
2. an instance of great veneration of a person, ideal, or thing, especially as manifested by a body of admirers: the physical fitness cult.
3. the object of such devotion.
4. a group or sect bound together by veneration of the same thing, person, ideal, etc.
5. Sociology . a group having a sacred ideology and a set of rites centering around their sacred symbols.

look at 4#. Sounds to me people working at crysler is a cult. everyone wants to get out of there.

Its not a cult, its not really definable. But if you pm your email or skype i can share more information that is controversal with overwhelming evidence to support everything i said.
 
Yes I believe First Nations are represented at the United Nations. The thing that I find confusing, and again please correct me if I am wrong, is that First Nations usually do not recognize provinces, rather individual treaties. These treaties were individually signed by Governor General, as a representative of Her Majesty the Queen.

Are you trying to state that your treaty rights take precedent over family law and it is that reason that you do not believe you have to present income information? Interesting if that is the case.
 
you are correct first nations has immense pull on canada as much as the government hates to admit it. They are probably sucking up because the 99 year treaty is about to expire. A friend of mine works in real estate and he told me the government is giving up several thousands of acres of land and allocating it for first nation programs.

First nations do not recognize provinces to a degree of boundaries. I cant give more information because i dont have more information for this.

The governor general does sign things into law as a representative for Queen Elizabeth, this also includes several treaties. Unfortunately the Crown is NOT the Queen. The Queen is in buckingham palace, The Crown is in london Great Britain. Its odd that the Queen must request permission to enter into london. The Queen cant get her crown...guess theres more than meets the eye.

Certainly not. Family law still deals with ecclesiastical law which is a tough one to violate, not to mention common law. You would need a damn good reason to outright disobey.

Child support is the right of the child and to accommodate the childs needs, it should not matter how it is paid, but as long as it is paid. I know several fathers who had serious thoughts about suicide because the child support was destroying their lives from orders where courts were less merciful towards the fathers. Ever since i shown them alternative unconventional ways of setoff entire orders, they lead productive lives again.

Hope this helps to clarify your questions and to clarify my intent.

My intent is not to abuse my knowledge, i have every intention to care for my child in any way possible.
 
I think that if you want to go through the family court of Ontario (or whatever province you live in) you would be obligated to play by the rules of that province, whether you are First Nations or not. I don't believe the court cares how or if you pay your taxes but they would certainly be within their rights to request evidence of how you can support your child. If you do not pay taxes then you would be required to pay for the child's medical and educational costs.

Many years ago I recall Alberta Health Care sent out statements to everyone 4 times a year. Each and every time you accessed a health care service (doctor, hospital etc) it was listed on the statement. It was quite the eye-opener for everyone and showed the true cost of having health care. (This should be done again to remind people what it would cost if there was no health care).

Perhaps you have to think of alternate ways to provide evidence of your income.
 
I completely agree, the court has every right to ensure that the child will have his needs met. I have support from friends and family, i have direct access to farms for food and other materials. I also have my grand mother that can knit at mach speed 5.

She can knit an entire outfit in less then a day. This includes, socks, shirt, pants, coat, sweater, scarf, mitts, boots, and other things that children will need. I also will secure a place for 2 bedrooms 1 dedicated for my child. I have evidence and affidavits reinforcing these positions.

So what reason do i have to provide financial income. If you ask me im less of a burden on public debt...for whatever that means to people.

so arabian, i have evidence to provide clothing, food, shelter and warmth. Is there anything that is really needed? my network of people has a well versed characteristics so my child will experience several things that will be rewarding.
 
My son is 31 but I have many friends with young children. I see what it costs the parents.

Education: School fees, school bus, school activities
Clothes and personal toiletries: unless your child goes to a segregated school he/she will want to be dressed like the other kids. Boots, shoes.
Medical: semi-annual dental preventative check-ups, braces, glasses
Extra-curricular: skating, skiing, attending birthday parties, going to the zoo

Lots and lots of activities that your child will participate in, even when she is not living with you, but that you will probably be expected to pay 1/2 of. I believe these are referred to as "section 7" expenses. Others on this forum can give you better information for your province/state.

Child support is supposed to also cover for the child's home and food even when she is not living with you (I believe this is the primary reason for child support).

Lots of things for you to consider. While I realize you live an alternative life-style, unfortunately the mother of the child does not reside with you so you would probably be expected to accommodate the other parent's choice of lifestyle.
 
arabian, she put in a motion(well her lawyer), but the judge struck it out because the mother did not meet hardship. She did make a claim in her answer for child support and sole custody.

I highly doubt she will be awarded either. I have every intention for my child to be exposed to the things you mentioned above. I have a wide variety of people i know that can provide services either free or heavily reduced.

BTW is a he. My son. She was awarded sole custody UNTIL january 2013 to which it will be revised. This was the only way i was able to see my child since she threatened police action against me if i went to see my son. I plan to bring this up at case conference, i suspect the judge will not be pleased with the conduct of the mother.

I have made several affidavits from my friends and family to show i always had the intention of caring for my child. I have enough evidence to discredit the mother entirely. I also have evidence and documentation of the events since the birth of my child. That will not bode her very well and the judge will not be impressed.
 
Well good luck to you. I hope you can get some things resolved but many times these sorts of things drag on for years and years. We hear about people having to schlep their kids great distances for the joint custody.... then one of the parents wants to move... then one wants to change the schedule. Just an ongoing struggle.

Hope you can find a way to work things out that both you and the mother are agreeable to. I sincerely hope that good things happen for you and your son in the new year.
 
i am aware, and i try to make amends, but the mother for untold reason is not willing to cooperate, i believe there is case law that relates to this.

I wonder if that is grounds for a medical assessment. To determine any underlining issues or motives on the mother with regards to her misconduct. Possibly to address the issue of biased decisions and to ensure that she is not dwelling on the past and to have her move on?
 
Sysgreis you are not exempt from Canadian taxes or tax law.

You have not been declared a non-citizen by the CRA. Furthermore, you are a resident. You do not have to be a Canadian citizen to be required to pay taxes. Google "Landed Immigrant" for one example.

You exchanged services for payment. This is not a "gift." It is called working under the table. The people you work for are certainly at risk from CRA even if you believe you are not.

We have dropped this subject over a month ago at your request as it was irrelevant to the questions you were asking. You are the one bringing back to the discussion.

Here is the fact: At family court you will be required to make a full financial disclosure. If you declare that you have no income you will be imputed a wage. At the very least you will be imputed a minimum wage. If your ex is aware of any marketable skills you have and any history of any jobs you have done, or your education background - you were never clear if you completed college or university or not - you will be imputed a greater than minimum wage.

You have to anticipate that you will be imputed a wage of at least 20k a year, and possibly up to 30k a year depending on your qualifications.

The family court will not order you to file taxes, but you will continue to be imputed a wage until you can produce tax returns that show otherwise.

As I wrote to you months ago, you are losing money on this. The federal income supplement, GST refund, provincial income supplement, and the Child Tax Credit will add up to far more money than you would ever pay in taxes, if your income is actually as low as you claim.

You are hurting your child with this lifestyle, and a family court judge will see right through you.

The statements you wrote above about not being a citizen also call your mental stability into question, and Tayken has previously posted court decisions where the judge has done exactly this. You are damaging your credibility and greatly reducing your chances of custody.

If you get your name put on the birth records this information is sent to CRA and they will start tracking you down. Presumably you have no bank account and are paid cash, but the mother will have to put your name and address on her tax return if she has it, and report any amount of support you pay.

You completely misunderstand the nature of 50/50 shared parenting if you believe that this simply negates any requirement to pay child support. It doesn't matter if the mother lives with her parents, or if her parents are millionaires, setoff support will be calculated and section 7 expenses will have to be paid. That is if you get 50/50, and again, you are putting that in jeapardy through your tax claim.

If nothing else, be aware that a family court judge will not hear your claims about taxation, and will not believe a word of it if you submit it writing. They don't care. They expect you to have an income. Period. They expect you to report proof of this income. Period.

Finally you should be aware that family court decisions for income disclosure have taken into account that a party has been evading taxes. What happens then is that their income is grossed upwards. In other words if you pay taxes on 20k you are acknowledged as having approximatly 14-15k after tax. If you don't pay taxes, then you are considered to have more money available so you will be grossed up to around 26k.

You have no proof of income, the family court judge won't hear your tax claims, you will be imputed a wage. Get used to the idea.
 
hadenough said:
If there's a tribe or a cult that I can join to get me out of the $$ crap I'm in - lol could someone please tell me where to enlist?
Click to expand...

I think the 2012 Mayan Cult had some special tax status but I have a feeling that's not going to last long...
 
Well if there was a way to do that I think many of us would have our ex's examined. No we cannot control the way other people think. All you can do is present your case the best you can and let the judge decide. The judge will hopefully decide what is in the best interest of child without unfairly impinging upon the rights of the parents. Keep in mind however, the the judge will be making the decision within the framework of the Canadian and provincial judicial systems. You may have to adapt your parenting plan to one that works within mainstream society.
 
arabian, yes i understand that.

currently i believe the 2-2-3-3 plan is best suited as the child will see each parent often without prolonged period of time.

I am very much aware that judge often have to work within the framework of the judicial system and that is to include any of its associated acts or even its history of decisions.

I trust that the judge will be extremely pleased with the parenting plan that i plan to bring forth. I have taken into account every possible thing to the best of my ability.

Thank you arabian for your continued thoughts and ideas, they are much appreciated.
 
Mess said:
The statements you wrote above about not being a citizen also call your mental stability into question, and Tayken has previously posted court decisions where the judge has done exactly this. You are damaging your credibility and greatly reducing your chances of custody.
Click to expand...

Actually, the Family Court does not have jurisdiction over tax law. They won't as I stated previously order you to file your taxes, although I have found jurisprudence in the past that they have.

The typical pattern is that they order the past 3 years, give you time to produce them, when you don't then the other party files a contempt of court motion.

The judge will then give you more time to provide a remedy. If you again fail, they will order substantial costs against you. From there the other party's lawyer will start to seek striking of your materials possibly or preventing you from continuing in the case.

Or they will seek a fine. You fail to pay the fine then you will get to meet the law enforcement agent who will seek payment of the fine. Failure to pay will land you back in court.

Or they will reduce access to the child and even make it supervised. An argument can be made that you are a flight risk as you claim to not be "Canadian" and non-resident. Just the utterance of this could find a very strict supervised access at an access centre.

I truly think you are on a good path. I try not to judge you based on your OACP litigation beliefs. But, you draw this into family court and your credibility will be shot before the court.

I implore you to not take this position and re-read Mess' post a few times. I do know you are frustrated and you want to find some "loop hole" in the system of family law. It just isn't there and your argument won't help you.

Your child loves you, needs both parents equally involved in their lives, and children are about sacrifice. This might having to sacrifice your personal beliefs in the OACP litigation world - for the best interests of your child and so you can be a father to this child.

Good Luck!
Tayken
 
Tayken.

Nowhere in any of my documents that i filed with the court even has anything related to freeman crap. Everything i have done is from the book. Therefor they have no reason to believe any of this.

You are correct, Family law cannot deal with tax law.

OACP i am assuming its that freeman approach, again nothing of the sort is in the court file nor do i see any reason for it to be in there. I do things in private and make a habit of not publicizing, hence why i have so much success in what i do. I also mentioned that i do not share OACP beliefs. I stick to fact.

being a non-resident of canada means you cannot obtain a conventional passport, so its difficult. You must make arrangements with fellow embassies and they make a record of that, so the authorities will know which country you went. I know this because i had to do this in the past.

I am not frusterated with anything, its not loop-holes as you would put it, the things i talk about is there for a reason, its just too long for me to explain. perhaps when you clear your inbox, tayken we can take this to another avenue so you can see im not full of shit. I have the evidence to support everything i say. Things are not what they seem to be.

Family law is in my favor. I have too much evidence against the mother for willful parental alienation and i know that the mother has absolutely nothing she can prove in her answer. i also cant forget that the judge from contempt hearing made a scathing remark about the efforts of the parents of the respondent. therefor in my view i think its highly recommended that the respondent accepts the offer to settle as it is extremely reasonable and we can move on with our lives.
 
Last edited:
Sysgreis, the nr302-10e form that you are using is for a partnership, where one or more partners are non-residents. In such a case, the non-residents would not be paying taxes in Canada, and their income would be subject to their home state taxation.

You, as a resident of Canada, working in Canada, would still pay tax on your percentage of the partnership.

The only way you could make use of this form is if you were running a scam with a fake partner who was a resident on a reserve.

Aboriginal people working off-reserve pay income tax. Aboriginal people who own shares of Canadian corporations or who are partners in businesses off reserve pay income tax.

If you have a partnership with someone living on a reserve, you still pay income tax on your share of the partnership. They should be paying income tax on their share, although there may be a loophole if they are claiming they are "working" on the reserve. If they are then funneling the money back to you, you are both committing fax fraud. If you are not remitting any money them to them in the first place, you are committing tax fraud.

There is no way that you could use that form to legally avoid paying taxes for work you perform unless you have a complex fraud scheme going on.
 
that form is there intentionally to hopefully have people connect the dots. You missed the point entirely.

I never said i was working on Canada. i never said i was avoiding paying taxes, i also don't have the time to think up a tax scheme.

that form is used to enter into partnership with actual canada/your province. Canada is a public trading corporation like all the nations of the world.

Dun & Bradstreet - Company Search Results

this is why people don't release information, people jump the gun running in blind expecting something without understanding what they are doing.

Again, what Canada are you referring to. Democratic Canada? Republic of Canada? Jurisdiction of Canada? Common Wealth of Canada?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top