Making sure im on the right path.

So i got all the information i want to put in my offer to settle.

Only thing is, dont know how or what it suppose to look like. anyone got some structural template?
 
This issue has come up more than a few times on the forum. There is no standard form that the court requires so I guess that's why they don't offer an Offer to Settle form.

I made my own using Word. If you want a copy of it I can e-mail it to you.
 
SynGreis said:
besides my style of working is..

1. all under the table
2. i have never filed taxes
3. i have no intention to leave her hanging out to dry, no problem.
4. i know enough about law that gifts are exempted. conveniently all that i work for are gifts.
Click to expand...
Hahahahahahahaha! My ex tried that. The judge imputed a rather large income on him.

Good luck to you there.

Hahahahahahaha!
Sorry, seriously, I just can't stop laughing at your sheer ignorance...especially when you said, you know a lot about court.
 
go back and read it again. i do criminal and civil.

madm82...good name there. she cant get support if custody and access is 50/50. since she has no reason to not do this its not happening.
 
SynGreis said:
go back and read it again. i do criminal and civil.

madm82...good name there. she cant get support if custody and access is 50/50. since she has no reason to not do this its not happening.
Click to expand...
Not that I read this whole thread as it is way too long and seems to be about varying issues, but, do you currently have 50/50? Last I read you had access one day a week for 2 hours. Also, just glancing through, did YOU take a DNA test to prove paternity?
 
no i didnt get a dna test, shes not bringing up the other guy and i fall within parent definition anyways.

she couldnt get support because its a substantive issue and she tried to bring it in a motion but judge said no since shes with her parents and striken it.

she would give 50/50 since this happened prior to case conference.
 
SynGreis said:
go back and read it again. i do criminal and civil.

madm82...good name there. she cant get support if custody and access is 50/50. since she has no reason to not do this its not happening.
Click to expand...

The Superior Court, Family Division is a division of *civil* court governed under the Courts of Justice Act. FLR is an extensions of the COJA.

Hence the title:

"Courts of Justice Act - ONTARIO REGULATION 114/99 - FAMILY LAW RULES"

Courts of Justice Act - O. Reg. 114/99

If you don't file taxes the court will order you produce your past 3 tax returns for the determination of CS on an offset method even on 50-50. You don't file them then you will be in contempt of a civil court order which can be brought forward as contempt. Contempt is a quasi criminal action with fine or incarceration as options for the judge for non-compliance.

I highly recommend you file your income taxes.

Good Luck!
Tayken
 
SynGreis said:
no i didnt get a dna test, shes not bringing up the other guy and i fall within parent definition anyways.

she couldnt get support because its a substantive issue and she tried to bring it in a motion but judge said no since shes with her parents and striken it.

she would give 50/50 since this happened prior to case conference.
Click to expand...
I do think you are being rather silly. Think of your future before you take on a child that is possibly not yours. As one day you will (hopefully)find a lovely woman that you have children with. One day you will want to man up and get a job- a real tax paying job. Just think of all the money you won't have towards your family because of this. If you are not the dad, one day this child may seek out her real dad- and tell YOU off, yet you are still stuck paying. Oh and then all the extra expenses on top....don't forget post secondary education as well. Please, get a DNA test.

You forced your way into falling under parental definition.
 
parent was defined prior to this other guy, she lied and she admitted it herself.

CRA will NOT allow me to file taxes as i do not fall under a definition of canadian citizenship so therefor i cannot declare or reclare and for my name to be in the sole discretion of the secretariat treasury board of canada.

So i cannot and will never be able to sign anything for declaration. The court knows this and therefor cannot compel me to do something that is illegal.

No its not tax evasion or tax protest shit.

again, i make decent money. Canada is mandated to provide free education all the way up to college. I successfully discharged my 48k student loan. Its not going to be any different because the basic principle is the same. The government is REQUIRED by international conventions to provide education(yes including college/university) and therefor cannot deny if you take the appropriate channels.

And again, the judge stricken out her motion for child support because she is with her parents and do not meet hardship.

So the only way she can get child support is after trial. And for that to be in effect she MUST prove that i am incapable to care for my child. She has no evidence to support this and i have compelling evidence that she has obstructed the bond between my child and his bloodline father, me.

So again. please enlighten me as to how she will get anything let alone have me be required to file taxes to which i have no jurisdiction over. Go read section 2 of the income tax act.
 
Last edited:
madm82 said:
Message removed for flaming
Click to expand...

From the sounds of it your being very prejudice.

Your making the claim that i leech off the system to which you pay taxes for.

Do you have any evidence on me to show that i simply sit on my ass and twiddle my thumbs all day collecting cheques doing nothing.

It is not my fault you are unable to read the acts that you claim that binds you.

CanLII - Income Tax Act, RSC 1985, c 1 (5th Supp)

2. (1) An income tax shall be paid, as required by this Act, on the taxable income for each taxation year of every person resident in Canada at any time in the year.

I am a resident of Ontario, not a resident of Canada. Despite what you may believe is true, i have enough documentation to support my position so until you have evidence to show that people residing in the "Boundaries" of Canada cannot be a resident of Ontario. I am a resident of Ontario, Not Canada.

CanLII - Interpretation Act, RSC 1985, c I-21

“Canada”

« Canada »

“Canada”, for greater certainty, includes the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada;

IF Canada was to include lands, why didnt they just say...

for greater certainty, means the internal waters of Canada, territorial sea of Canada and the land within each province.

there is a reason why they use means and include. CRA confirmed that Canada does not exist in the province with exeption of lakes, bodies of waters. I have a confirmed letter from CRA, AG of Ontario, Leutenant Governor, Governor General, Privy Council and The High Office of the Secretariat of Queen Elizabeth(not Her Majesty, different capacities).

Also you claim that i am leeching off your education system, despite your belief, Canada signed an international convention on May 19th 1976. This was ratified soon after.

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

Article 13

1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to education. They agree that education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and the sense of its dignity, and shall strengthen the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. They further agree that education shall enable all persons to participate effectively in a free society, promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations and all racial, ethnic or religious groups, and further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.

2. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize that, with a view to achieving the full realization of this right:

(a) Primary education shall be compulsory and available free to all;

(b) Secondary education in its different forms, including technical and vocational secondary education, shall be made generally available and accessible to all by every appropriate means, and in particular by the progressive introduction of free education;

(c) Higher education shall be made equally accessible to all, on the basis of capacity, by every appropriate means, and in particular by the progressive introduction of free education;

(d) Fundamental education shall be encouraged or intensified as far as possible for those persons who have not received or completed the whole period of their primary education;

(e) The development of a system of schools at all levels shall be actively pursued, an adequate fellowship system shall be established, and the material conditions of teaching staff shall be continuously improved.

3. The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to have respect for the liberty of parents and, when applicable, legal guardians to choose for their children schools, other than those established by the public authorities, which conform to such minimum educational standards as may be laid down or approved by the State and to ensure the religious and moral education of their children in conformity with their own convictions.

4. No part of this article shall be construed so as to interfere with the liberty of individuals and bodies to establish and direct educational institutions, subject always to the observance of the principles set forth in paragraph I of this article and to the requirement that the education given in such institutions shall conform to such minimum standards as may be laid down by the State.

2c states that it must be made available at every appropriate means., no income great you dont NEED OSAP. Just invoke the treaty. thats what i did for my last 2 degrees. They never bothered asking for payment again.

Also please note section 3, states public school by the authorities meets MINIMUM requirements. Sorry not interested for my child to have minimum education.

I have given evidence several times over and over, it is not my problem that people have such a high level of difficulty that they have been coned by the very government they support.

PS, the roads, maintenance fees, construction and other services that would otherwise be believed to be paid for by taxes is in fact endorsed and funded solely by the Ministry of Finance by the utilization of the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

Does anyone here on the forums have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that taxes gets paid into that fund in trust? I dont think they do because its not used for that purpose.

Also its worth mentioning that CRA has stated several times with my correspondance that taxes must be paid by a canadian citizen, BUT a canadian citizen must be a public officer that is found to be directly implementing some sort of government legislation or body to provide services to the public and the true heads of the sovereign state. Guess who those are....

https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/const/const1982.html

Application of Charter
32. (1)This Charter applies
(a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and
(b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

Again and again, the income tax act only applies federally and therefor subject to the charter. the charter s32 applies to government and legislative authorities and s52 states it is the supreme law.

People defame me saying im lazy and a leech. To the contrary, i am one of the people who keeps the government in check, you know that same government your ever so dependant on, federally.

I am here not to have my rights trampled, but to enforce them to the highest degree. Meaning i have the HIGHEST respect of the law.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am trying to follow this post but I'm a bit lost (and fascinated) by the exclusion from CRA taxes. Syngreis the only people I know who do not have to pay taxes would be First Nations/aboriginal peoples of Canada. I certainly don't know everything about tax law so do correct me if I am not correct.

I don't know how you can be a resident of Ontario but not a resident of Canada.

Perhaps you have a treaty card?

Does anyone now if members of religious cults have to pay taxes?
 
and i already expressed intention to care equally in all avenues to care for the child, she is the one who forced me out it was only possible to see my son because i pressured her to get something, i have every intention to put it 50/50 the second case conference is completed, hell i got my motion already to go.

"So i cannot and will never be able to sign anything for declaration. The court knows this and therefor cannot compel me to do something that is illegal.
So become a Canadian citizen.
No its not tax evasion or tax protest shit."

Why would i want to do that. i am so much more freer then when i was a canadian citizen. Besides like i said in my last post, i do not have the intention to become a public servant or public officer. Nor do i have any use or reason.

"So the only way she can get child support is after trial. And for that to be in effect she MUST prove that i am incapable to care for my child. BULL!!!!!"

You must have had a lawyer, you clearly dont know the procedures.

"Who cares? I've already determined that YOU are a self-serving LEECH! You make good money (so you claim) so please re-pay us tax-paying CITIZENS back our 48k. Thank you!"

Your not judge, judy and executioner, therefor your opinion is irrelevant and goes to show you have extreme prejudice.

Your comments goes to show you know nothing about my situation. I respectfully request that you become informed prior to making unbased remarks that is defaming my character.
 
If there's a tribe or a cult that I can join to get me out of the $$ crap I'm in - lol could someone please tell me where to enlist?
 
arabian said:
I am trying to follow this post but I'm a bit lost (and fascinated) by the exclusion from CRA taxes. Syngreis the only people I know who do not have to pay taxes would be First Nations/aboriginal peoples of Canada. I certainly don't know everything about tax law so do correct me if I am not correct.

I don't know how you can be a resident of Ontario but not a resident of Canada.

Perhaps you have a treaty card?

Does anyone now if members of religious cults have to pay taxes?
Click to expand...

Hi arabian.

if you go back to my post a few posts back i given the evidence to explain this better. Its the same as the US. You can be a floridian resident and not be a US citizen. resident and citizenship is NOT the same. VERY different capacities.

Yes i do have a treaty in place in order to ensure my rights and benefits are respected. Its called a NR302-10e form from CRA.

Declaration of Eligibility for Benefits under A Tax Treaty for A Partnership with Non-Resident Partners

Form NR 302: http://http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/E/pbg/tf/nr302/nr302-10e.pdf

If you have a canadian citizenship and another citizenship then you may be considered as a hybrid entity...Note the entity....foreign in nature....:)
Declaration of Eligibility for Benefits under a Tax Treaty for a Hybrid Entity

Form NR 303: http://http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/E/pbg/tf/nr303/nr303-10e.pdff

The first nations are the true sovereigns and supreme court upheld it several times. Unfortunately the canadian government has commited several treasonous acts against the "original people"(aboriginal is a defined status within canada, a tactic of deceit) to subrogate their rights and become canadian citizens. If you have no status with the government then you are a non resident. This has immense beneficial properties. If only you guys understood the power you can do with those.(If you have a BC within one of the provinces or show your birthright(thats for another day :))) .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top