Making sure im on the right path.

SynGreis said:
was waiting on tayken with the conference brief example.
Click to expand...

Not sure if it'll help or not but, if you want, I can send you a copy of the conference brief that I recently submitted. It contains 4 pages of facts in point form.

I was a little worried that it wasn't brief enough, but I will say I was more than pleasantly surprised when the Judge stated that it was one of the most well prepared briefs he had ever read from a self represented individual.

One thing the Judge was very complimentary on, was the fact that I took the time to include positive comments about the other party by giving her credit where it was due.
 
arabian said:
What the hell are you requesting "feed your own child" - kind of sounds weird. Also I would ask what you propose to feed your child?
Click to expand...
I think he wants to bond with the child by feeding. If the child is breastfeeding the mother can pump and it can be put in a bottle, how difficult is that??? If not breastfeeding then the child can eat what ever foods kids their age eat.
 
yes the child is having some "baby food". you are correct, i want to share those experiences with my son.

those natural pathic voodoo doctors has been around ALOT longer then conventional doctors. i think they have a bit more experience with natural remedies and the functions of viruses and diseases then traditional doctors. take scurvy for example. doctors didnt know at that time. indians told them to get vitamin c.
 
Indians didn't tell them to get "vitamin C". Treatment with vitamin C was discovered by, wait for it..... Doctors. Stop and think about where the knowledge of actual vitamins comes from.

Treatment with citrus fruits was known since at least the ancient Greeks. And just so you know, Hippocrates was using the scientific method, he was a doctor not a naturopath. The disease itself wasn't widespread until long journeys by ship were common; the "indians" (I take it you mean North American aboriginal) wouldn't have suffered from it normally.
 
Mess said:
Indians didn't tell them to get "vitamin C". Treatment with vitamin C was discovered by, wait for it..... Doctors. Stop and think about where the knowledge of actual vitamins comes from.

Treatment with citrus fruits was known since at least the ancient Greeks. And just so you know, Hippocrates was using the scientific method, he was a doctor not a naturopath. The disease itself wasn't widespread until long journeys by ship were common; the "indians" (I take it you mean North American aboriginal) wouldn't have suffered from it normally.
Click to expand...
and here is the proof.

Who discovered how to cure Scurvy with Vitamin C ? - Yahoo! Answers
 
also want to share that naturalpathic doctors have been applying the scientific method for millenniums. they are not profit driven.

scientific method is testing observing recording and more testing.

conventional doctors are funded by pharmaceuticals. your naive if you think the pharmaceuticals can make money if everyone was healthy.

conventional doctors are very limited into truly helping you and don't forget they have maybe 4 hours of class that truly focuses on nutrition. They also cannot make money off people who are healthy for that would eliminate the majority of their profession. Nautoral pathic doctors or "voodoo" doctors do not make money because their client list is not big due to the help and assistance they offer that eliminates prolonged returning on most cases.
 
The aboriginal shamans of North America have be conducting labratory experiments for centuries. Millenia even. It's all documented in cave paintings. They started researching scurvey when they were circumnavigating the globe in their canoes. They live in nature, hence the term "Naturopaths" meaning white people making indians sick. Or something like that. They invented vitamins and traded them to Scottish doctors for beads.
 
Also Ubiquinol, a more active form of CoQ10, was invented by a Japanese man named Kaneka, when he was found wandering around his village looking for green tea leaves to sell to tourists. (Only partly true.)
 
never said they invented vitamins.

the indians never really had any laboratories because they never believed in that kind of funding.

the indians never left their land because they believed in mother nature and spirituality and they felt that they are the stewards of the land and cannot leave until someone has passed on that responsibility. Therefor traveling around the globe at that time was unrealistic even columbus was hard pressed to receive funding to explore "the new world" assuming at that time it even exists.

natural paths were just a simple label given in order to quickly define a specific set of skills traits and characteristics in some situations.

the white people when they met the indians were plagues with bacteria that the indians did not encounter before so therefor their immune systems could not handle the introduction of the new germs. Its like you go on a new continent, you need to get a shot incase you contract strains of viruses the inhabitants would otherwise be immune to because of the environment. the same applies in this situation.

vitamins were never really invented. there was several people who coined the terminology but it wasnt until the establishment of WHO is when vitamins was actively explored to a great degree and built upon.

the scottish at the time of exploration of the new world did not take part in the expedition so therefor that is untrue.

also for proof, read up the treaty of bermise and the back workings of the british north american act. it makes reference that the indians (the original is what they call on the land, aboriginal was a status created by the government in order to bestow special rights and privileges for subrogation). in there also makes reference that several pressing cures was given freely by the indians as they had more experience in that field of herbology(wasnt called that at that time).

for the bermise treaty you may find it difficult in finding that as very few law libraries will have it. i was fortunate to come across that when i was seeking something related to that.
 
I have to agree with OP that in general doctors are not adequately educated in nutrition and natural remedies, and the pharmaceutical companies are also generally more intererested in profits than patient safety.

It all comes down to the fact that we the people have to look after our own health and not depend upon doctors and drugs to magically make us well after years of eating the wrong foods, not exercising, abusing our bodies with the misuse of alcohol and drugs. Doctors and drugs are necessary and can save lives, but we also have to make the effort to become educated and concerned enough to take care of ourselves.
 
i agree that drugs has a place and so is doctors but that should be used for medical emergencies or checkups and for doctors to advice changes immediately.

i agree drugs like morphine or codeine can make surgery or a painful transition of a disease or the like more bearable.

i take care of my own body and i have never used a drug outside of surgery and an emergency i had a while ago.

i am healthy, i exercise, i eat the right foods, not that mcds or dinner in a box crap.

when people do these decisions they will also realize that doctors become much more irrelevant and more concentrated in emergency rooms.
 
So she failed to reschedule as visit. She KNEW i was not available on wednesday. She had all of thursday, friday saturday and sunday to reschedule. i see no willing from her to compensate for this.

Consent order dated September 21st 2012 made by The Honourable Scott Campbell. Paragraph 3 states:
"The Applicant shall have supervised access in the child's home two hours per week until January 2013 supervised by either of the Respondent's parents


notice of contempt is being drawn up at the moment.
 
Maybe I am wrong, however, unless your order states that make up time is a must you may be out of luck. If you visit every Wednesday and this Wednesday you were not available, that is not her problem. Sure, it would be nice if she issued make up time, but she is not obligated to unless the order states she must.

It is my understanding that if a NCP misses their time with the children, the CP is under no obligation to issue make up time. But why did YOU not request make up time? Why are you waiting on her to suggest time? For all she knows, you didn't want make up time because you never requested.

Others may correct me, but you cannot issue contempt because YOU were unavailable for the scheduled access time.
 
because the last 5 weeks has been on friday and i given her notice way before that wednesdays were not available for me. She KNEW this.

i attempted to work something out for catch up but shes not responding at all.

what stops her from doing something on thursday, friday, saturday, sunday. im available on all of those days. it could be seen as she is unwilling.

the order did not specify a time also. so nothing stops her from changing it to those 4 days to which im available on the entire day.
 
Last edited:
i looked at the paragraph again it says SHALL.

meaning it is required for me to have access. it does not say that the mother can schedule whatever. all reasonable efforts by both parties should be made to make this happen. i have sent several emails in trying to work this out but to no response.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top