ethics of lawyers

Motion scheduled for mid August, Strike of pleadings motion or in the alternative 53k in punitive damages plus $1k per day in fines for not providing disclosure to CBV....it's been 6 years.. doubt a judge will impose this but lawyer put it forward. Hoping for some real justice finally
 
Need some help,

Managed to secure funds to be held in trust from a sale of a home by respondent...

Judge said respondent verge of paranoia but would not strike his pleadings, instead move up my trial from next September to now....

Last minute my lawyer wanted $100k to do trial, had to borrow funds of 30k to prep everything, (all about the $$ even though i was a client for 5 years....

Self repped and did amazing except for learning case lines,,,

Respondent went from making $40k to $250k each year thanks to a valuator report and thats only on limited disclosure...this last week was beyond stressful with 24 hours notice your trial starts next day... believe u can do it as facts and the truth are the truth...

So now.......I have closing arguments....don't know what to do for case law...SO IF ANYONR HAS GOOD CASE LAW PLEASE LET ME KNOW....

DURESS SIGNING SEPARATION AGREEMENT-
NO DISCLOSURE
NO LAWYER OR COUNSEL
RESPONDENT FAKED HIS INCOME BY 200K
DID NOT HONOR SEPARATION AGREEMENT BY NOT PAYINF CHILD SUPPORT, NOT HAVING LIFE INSURANCE, NOT DIVIDIN ASSETS EQUALLY ON SALE OF MATRIMONIAL HOME..

Iam looking set aside the separation agrrement, retroactive child and sposalu support...

I can tell the story its the case law to back it up i need help with..

If anyone can send some precedants that r similar in nature that would be awesome..

Light At end of tunnel looks brighter each day... 6.5 year fight...
cheers
 
You should use chatgpt... Simple request produced the below. Also, I would recommend you write up bullet points, summaries of key facts and have chat gpt help you write up sections of your closing argument. Don't ask it to write the whole thing in one prompt- develop an outline and work with chatgpt to write up each section. You can use that as your basis for the closing arguments.

from chatgpt:
In Ontario, several cases address the grounds for setting aside a separation agreement. Here are a few significant cases that may be relevant:
  1. Bergman v. Bergman (1993): This case emphasizes the importance of full financial disclosure. If one party did not receive complete financial information, the agreement may be set aside.
  2. Kearney v. Kearney (2000): This case discusses the issue of unconscionability, where one party took advantage of the other’s vulnerability. It highlights that if the agreement is fundamentally unfair, it may be set aside.
  3. Baker v. Baker (2004): In this case, the court considered the issue of lack of independent legal advice. If one party did not fully understand the implications of the agreement, it could be a reason to set it aside.
  4. M v. M (2014): This case focuses on the principle of duress, where one party was pressured into signing the agreement. The court may intervene if the agreement was not entered into freely.
  5. McCafferty v. McCafferty (2013): This case involved the review of circumstances surrounding the agreement, including the context in which it was signed and whether it was made under a misapprehension of the facts.
When considering setting aside a separation agreement, it's essential to consult a legal professional who can analyze the specific circumstances and provide tailored advice based on current law and case precedents.
​
 
Prompt: Please provide a summary of Baker v Baker from Ontario focusing on setting aside separation agreements
ChatGPT said:

ChatGPT

Baker v. Baker from Ontario is a significant family law case that deals with the issue of setting aside separation agreements. In this case, the court examined whether a separation agreement, which typically governs the division of property and spousal support following the breakdown of a marriage, could be overturned or modified.

The key legal question centered on whether the agreement was fair, made with full financial disclosure, and whether both parties entered into it freely and voluntarily, without undue influence or coercion.

Key Points of the Case:
  1. Financial Disclosure: The court emphasized that for a separation agreement to be binding, both parties must have made full and frank financial disclosure. If one party was not fully informed about the other’s financial situation, the agreement might be set aside.
  2. Unconscionability: The court reviewed whether the terms of the agreement were unconscionable at the time it was signed. If the agreement was grossly unfair to one party, it could be deemed unconscionable and subject to revision.
  3. Voluntariness: The parties must have entered into the separation agreement voluntarily, without any undue pressure or influence. If one party was coerced or under duress when signing, the agreement might be invalidated.
  4. Independent Legal Advice: The availability and quality of independent legal advice is also a factor. If a party did not receive proper legal advice before entering into the agreement, the court might find that it was unfair and set it aside.
In Baker v. Baker, the court's decision to set aside or uphold the separation agreement hinged on these principles. The ruling underscores the importance of fairness, transparency, and voluntariness in family law agreements, particularly when one party seeks to challenge the agreement after it has been executed.

This case illustrates how Ontario courts approach separation agreements, ensuring they are fair and equitable, especially when financial matters are at stake.​
 
I like the idea of having A.I. help with writing and finding information. This can help so much; just make sure to double check the cases/info to ensure it's correct.

Your case law used to help support your claims will go in your Book of Authorities and submitted to your ex and judge. You're not really going through them during your closing statement. The judge will read it after and address them in the final order if needed.

Your closing statement is more of a summary of what you want the judge to decide - supported by the trial's testimonies, evidence, documents, witnesses, etc. You're also explaining how/why this evidence does not support your ex's claims.

You're talking directly to the judge, summarizing the trial and guiding them on what their decision should be.
 
Thank you all... I will post jusgement when it xomes in...think I did very well,,, ex used defence of laches so he doesn't have to pay spousal support...
 
9 day trial held in September 2024? Waiting on judgement from superior court judge still.

What is the usual wait time for a decision?
 
Sending my empathy—waiting on a decision can be incredibly tough. In our case, the trial in the Ontario Court of Justice took 7 weeks for a written decision, and the appeal decision in the Superior Court took 8 weeks. While we waited, I looked up our judge(s) on CanLII to get a sense of typical timelines between trial and written judgment. Hoping yours comes through soon—hang in there!
 
Victorviola said:
9 day trial held in September 2024? Waiting on judgement from superior court judge still.

What is the usual wait time for a decision?
Click to expand...

The expectation for judges is that decisions will be released within 6 months of the conclusion of the hearing. How long after a trial will often depend on how complex the case is, the judge's case load, and the individual judge.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top