Denied Access, need help!

Status
Not open for further replies.
All the documentation given to the lawyer does not engage anything against my ex at all, besides the fact of her obviously denying me access and impacting our sons life with change/in-continuity. It's all primarily directed towards the best interest for our son, because those are my true intentions.

If my ex does choose to play dirty- which she most likely will at some point, should I begin preparing further documentation for when & if it gets to that stage?

I've already got a few points in my back pocket that unfortunately do slander her ability to deal with the stress of parenting, and would help build my case. I really don't want to see it get to that point, but like every one is saying- her and her lawyers are not out to play fair.
 
Unless you have a criminal record, or some sort of mental health issue that make you a danger to the kid, it's not relevant. Don't slander her. You'll get WAY more mileage out of staying child focused and trying to promote a parenting plan that maximizes contact with BOTH parents.

They will try to drag you through the mud, but any response you put forth is going to be ONE bullet point. If the allegations are that severe, you challenge that there is no supporting documentation to her claims, no police reports, no records of any kind. Then you move on.

There are proper ways of handling TRUE issues like that, and she won't use those organizations. Individuals making false allegations will very very rarely do so, because it can bite them in the ass.
 
I have spoken to and retained a lawyer today. She will have the application drafted and ready for tomorrow, I will then get it served later that evening, and return the next day to file to forms with the court.

Good for you young man. Stay the course,be smart and there is no reason why you shouldn't get what your son needs. Best of luck. We're all rooting for you.
 
My ex-girlfriend and I were together for about 2.5 years, our son was born 8 months ago. I moved into her Dad's house the moment we found out she was pregnant, at that time I was the only one bringing in income to support her throughout the pregnancy and took her to all appointments.

Start documenting that you did this. The dates of the appointments, with what clinicians you saw, and as a custodial parent with "joint custody" you can get the medical records from these clinicians to backup your claims. You can request copies of your child's medical records.

One month before the birth of our son, we moved into my parents house. We had happily lived here and raised our son here till last week when she decided to up and leave.

Technically, the mother removed your child from their primary residence without your consent and against your wishes. She basically took the law into her own hands and may possibly be in violation of Section 283.(1) of the criminal code of Canada. (This is extreme but, pointing out the current law your access to the child is governed by until proceedings happen in Family Court).

She was on welfare since his birth and I was bringing in extra income with freelancing design jobs until I got a full time job 3 months ago. Also my parents supported us a lot, majority of the time we were there- they supplied all diapers, wipes, formula etc.

Collect the receipts from your parents proving that they provided this additional support and all your evidence to your support of the child. Don't just say you did it... Prove it with *evidence*. Receipts, bank account statements, etc. Get it all put together.

Anyway, she went to her mothers last week for "space", I was even courteous enough to drop her off. The next day I dropped off a few of the baby things she needed, and brought her some extra formula- I briefly got to see my son outside for 10 minutes or so.

Often parents do not understand the law and the rights of both parents. You have equal right to love and care for this child under the Criminal Code of Canada and the Children's Law Reform Act. Consult a lawyer as soon as possible on how to distil the oncoming challenges.

A few days later she had decided the relationship was over, I drove over to her house and knocked on her door to speak to her- after being denied that, I asked to at least see my son- I was also denied that. I left.

Access denial. Document the date and time you requested access to your child. Continue to request access and collect the evidence to the denial of access by the other parent.

Yesterday it had been one week since I'd seen him, she had told me I can bring all her stuff over and see him with the supervision of her mother- I agreed to that.

Assuming you are no risk of emotional and/or physical harm to her or the child there is no reason you shouldn't be allowed to equally care for the child in accordance with the above stated Acts and Laws.

Once I got there, only her mother was there and told me their lawyer suggested not letting my son or her have any contact with me till the court date.

Did you get service of the documentation?

She said they already filed for custody because they feared I was planning to take him away from them or flee the country with him. She also mentioned there's no way they would ever allow me to have 50/50 custody of him and would fight all the way even if it got dirty. I kept my cool, and left once again.

Make sure you document the time, date and who said this all to you and prepare it for your affidavit in response. Get a lawyer now.

Worst thing is, my brothers getting married next month and family that I only see every 5-6 years is coming over. They were all excited to see the little bundle of joy and I really wanted to introduce him to them- but seems that wont happen now.

Do you have the court documentation? You should have been served. Also, you can probably request and emergency motion to fix the custody and access issues. GET A GOOD LAWYER.

Alright now that I'm done with the huge back story, as you can see, I'm being denied access to my son. I have briefly spoke to a lawyer for advice but I was just wondering... what kind of custody agreements are usually decided in situations like this? I mean the child has lived in my house up until now, can she really keep him away from me like this?

50-50 full joint custody is what you legally have now. Just because the mother thinks not it is not the fact. In fact, they are on the borderline of child abduction. I would contact CAS to see what they can do. Both parents are equally responsible for their children.

I want to fight for 50/50 custody, with weeks alternating. I believe its the only fair way to share bonding time with our son. I don't want to loose out on his life. What are the chances of this actually happening?

Don't fight. Position for 50-50 which is the defacto custody and access under the law. Unless the other parent can prove otherwise you shouldn't be an equal care giver. You should be an equal care giver. Don't fight for what is already the fact and law.

Also at the time of birth I was not put on the birth certificate and the child has her last name, will this affect my case in anyway?

Your paternity will be challenged.

Anyway, any advice or insight would greatly be appreciated.
Thanks

The removal of a child without consent or a court order is a serious undertaking of any litigant in a family matter. You have a challenge in that they may claim your paternal rights don't exist and that you are not the father.

Good Luck!
Tayken
 
I have not been served any documents. I didn't even think of that until yesterday when I asked the courts if she had filed anything as of yet- which she obviously hasn't. So assuming she doesn't avoid being served the papers this evening (Oh, why do I have a bad feeling about that actually happening.) I will be the first to file.

In your personal opinion, do you believe my situation does qualify for an emergency motion? I kept being told my a few different lawyer that those motions are usually only used if the child is under some sort of danger.
 
I have not been served any documents. I didn't even think of that until yesterday when I asked the courts if she had filed anything as of yet- which she obviously hasn't. So assuming she doesn't avoid being served the papers this evening (Oh, why do I have a bad feeling about that actually happening.) I will be the first to file.

In your personal opinion, do you believe my situation does qualify for an emergency motion? I kept being told my a few different lawyer that those motions are usually only used if the child is under some sort of danger.

The lawyers are correct but, the danger is that you do not have access to the child. You are going to face a paternity question possibly.

Good that you are talking to solution oriented lawyers. I think a letter sent by courier (notice of service) outlining and questioning what is going on may be a better route.

You could file an "emergency" motion but, remember you have to document the hell out of them. Read "Tug of War" for a better reference on the expectations of the court on what is requierd for an "emergency" motion.

Don't play with "emergency" motions without clear and relevant evidence and you have to be more honest than honest in them. The balance of probabilities goes up a notch.

You are better to talk to the CAS to see how they can help possibly.

Good LUck!
Tayken
 
Yeah, I'm starting to lean towards avoiding the emergency motion route since there is no physical danger to my son. Still debating on it though, until I'm completely certain that my case doesn't qualify for it. It seems the only way the emergency motion would be justified is if I play dirty- which I rather not.

Basically the forms are completed now and will be submitted to the court by tomorrow. I suppose she'll have an allocated time to respond, and then there will be a case conference, and eventually a court date.

What an insanely dragged out process, my minds all over the place. I will discuss the topic of an emergency motion with my lawyer once again tomorrow to see if there is any clause we could approach with.

At the end of the day, I just want equal rights to my son, and she can argue all she wants but there's no doubt about it that his primary residence has been here since birth & I am more than capable of being an equal-caregiver with added support from a loving family. Hopefully this zero-contact rule her lawyer has set her on doesn't help build her case and develop a status quo, it's the only real fear I have at the moment.

Also, I contacted CAS and they told me there's nothing they could do to possibly help, and it'll have to be dealt with legally.
 
So its been awhile now, thought I'd give an update on the situation.

So as expected her affidavits were filled with nothing but wild allegations with zero evidence behind any of her statements. I was the first to file, which made me the applicant.

I attended an expedited case conference date a few days ago, where taking the judges recommendations- we had come to a temporary settlement of 2 days a week for 8 hours on each day, a non-removal order, return of any remaining items still in my possession, attend parenting classes, and to purchase a new crib for her.

My lawyer has advised me that this is great progress and a step towards the right direction. I am also pleased with the results seeing as I hadn't seen my son in almost a month and a half.

Just hoping to get some feedback and some enlightenment to whether or not this is regular procedure in regards to access, and what improvements to access I can expect in the future. Also, any tips about what I should to "protect my ass" during this time period since my ex does seem to be the malicious type and cause issues on anything she can get her hands on. I am currently keeping logs of my sons diet, time of pickup/drop-off, any rashes etc. that he arrived with and other misc. information.

I am currently expected to be back in court quite soon, in about a month.
 
So its been awhile now, thought I'd give an update on the situation.

So as expected her affidavits were filled with nothing but wild allegations with zero evidence behind any of her statements. I was the first to file, which made me the applicant.

I attended an expedited case conference date a few days ago, where taking the judges recommendations- we had come to a temporary settlement of 2 days a week for 8 hours on each day, a non-removal order, return of any remaining items still in my possession, attend parenting classes, and to purchase a new crib for her.

My lawyer has advised me that this is great progress and a step towards the right direction. I am also pleased with the results seeing as I hadn't seen my son in almost a month and a half.

Just hoping to get some feedback and some enlightenment to whether or not this is regular procedure in regards to access, and what improvements to access I can expect in the future. Also, any tips about what I should to "protect my ass" during this time period since my ex does seem to be the malicious type and cause issues on anything she can get her hands on. I am currently keeping logs of my sons diet, time of pickup/drop-off, any rashes etc. that he arrived with and other misc. information.

I am currently expected to be back in court quite soon, in about a month.

If you need help and are in Ontario send me a PM with your details. There is just too much to put into a message board post. See some of my other threads about the topic as well.
 
If you need help and are in Ontario send me a PM with your details. There is just too much to put into a message board post. See some of my other threads about the topic as well.

"Tayken has exceeded their stored private messages quota and cannot accept further messages until they clear some space."
 
Normal for when the kid has been away from you for an extended period of time, is that young, and where there are allegations being thrown. Access adjustments depend entirely on your lawyer and you. Follow the order ( have you been paying offset cs there chief?), and start pounding at parenting classes etc. You can likely expect gradual increases as you prove yourself.

As for how to protect yourself...don't engage, keep it in writing, document document document and stay child focused even if it kills you. Cliche, but it doesn't make it any less true.
 
Alright so I had another case conference.
Supervision was dropped, and she had agreed that access was going well. Access has now been changed to EOW Friday->Sunday & every Wednesday for 3 hours.

Custody hasn't been decided yet, she is seeking sole custody still which I do not agree with, so we did not include anything in our order at the moment and will discuss it at the next date in October.

1) How likely is it for her to get sole custody?
2) How controlling can she be about my access? Nothing is specified in the order. I do follow his schedule, but she is trying to restrict who I can visit with my son. (her dad, who she is on bad terms with now)
 
Alright so I had another case conference.
Supervision was dropped, and she had agreed that access was going well. Access has now been changed to EOW Friday->Sunday & every Wednesday for 3 hours.

Custody hasn't been decided yet, she is seeking sole custody still which I do not agree with, so we did not include anything in our order at the moment and will discuss it at the next date in October.

1) How likely is it for her to get sole custody?
2) How controlling can she be about my access? Nothing is specified in the order. I do follow his schedule, but she is trying to restrict who I can visit with my son. (her dad, who she is on bad terms with now)
why even tell her who you are letting your child see while with you?? Unless the person is a danger it is none of her business.
 
She found out through a third party.

Unless the person is a danger to the child, there is no restriction on whom you may be around during your parenting time.

If she tries to tell you that you can't be around A or B, simply state that you do not dictate whom she is entitled to associate with during her parenting time, and you would expect the same consideration in return.

Otherwise, radio silence. You are under no obligation to advise her of your plans or whom you are seeing during your parenting time. It is none of her business. You aren't married or together, she no longer gets to know about your personal life.
 
Unless the person is a danger to the child, there is no restriction on whom you may be around during your parenting time.

If she tries to tell you that you can't be around A or B, simply state that you do not dictate whom she is entitled to associate with during her parenting time, and you would expect the same consideration in return.

Otherwise, radio silence. You are under no obligation to advise her of your plans or whom you are seeing during your parenting time. It is none of her business. You aren't married or together, she no longer gets to know about your personal life.

Alright let me go a bit more in depth of what happened with this situation.

I attended my son's first cousin's 1st birthday party at my ex's fathers house. The following day I received a call from the ex's mother (whom she lives with and does almost all the communication between me and my ex, since my ex still refuses to contact me directly) , she was very angry toned and had threatened my access due to where I had been the previous day, claiming her father's house to be a unsafe environmental.

Her reasoning behind this, that she now brought to my attention, was that her father has a "criminal record" from the past. Nothing recent, he has been happily remarried with a new family and other kids.

Not to mention we lived with him during the entire pregnancy without any issues AND visited his house WITH our son very frequently while still together. And if this was such a unsafe environment- why wouldn't she of brought this to my attention beforehand?

She is simply saying all of this due to her own recent grudges and fallout with her father, which arose once we broke up due to the fact he was still in contact with me and neutral on the situation.

She has accused me of being vindictive by allowing our son to see her father and that I did it completely out of spite. I've been threatened that joint custody is completely out of the question, and she will be calling her lawyer to attempt to reduce my access due to my "bad judgement call". Also, she will deny me access if I ever visit him again.

This behavior seems very repetitive to what she did to me. Once she has a fallout with someone, and things don't go 100% her way- she will throw wild accusations to selfishly alienate our son from loving family members.

I have stayed child-focused and haven't said a word to them on the situation. I only look out for our son's best interests. In my eyes, family is very important in life and personal grudges shouldn't neglect our son from getting to know his own family. Her actions and words only further prove she is not child focused and is letting her own selfish emotions dictate our son's life.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top