Hide on Bush
New member
Is an appropriate offer one that includes the same terms I am seeking through my motion minus the seeking of costs?
FLR 18 (11):
(11) If an accepted offer does not deal with costs, either party is entitled to ask the court for costs. O. Reg. 114/99, r. 18 (11).
Just wondering why you need to go to file in court and not just let status quo continue. Make him file for parenting time... ignore the rest....
Plus there were financial aspects of your filing correct?
My comment was more along the lines of it isn�t status quo as he owes support. If he is going to bully your son then he can pay his full support amounts.
CS is the right of the child so they can claim whatever they want. A judge sees it as the child�s money and if he is making more, he should be paying more.
CS is the right of the child so they can claim whatever they want. A judge sees it as the child�s money and if he is making more, he should be paying more.
Right now I'm worried that if I don't get the courts involved then nothing is going to change between my son and my ex's relationship. Further, I believe my ex will file for contempt because my son wont go with my ex which is against the current order.
Just my opinion....you are trying way to hard on this and it is looking a little weird maybe controlling.
Due diligence has already been done and either your ex is going to step up or not; you can't control what they do.
One can go back as far as 8 years I think but also may not get it unless they have a good reason or are proactive. A couple of years may not be an issue.
The supreme court says 3 years. If he didnt update when his income went up by 100 grand then hes definitely in the wrong.
Getting an agreement done isnt controlling. If anything, sitting outside your house and the school is controlling and intimidating behaviour on his part.
If anything you are impatient.
I can understand the controlling aspect, and that is more around because my ex refuses to do anything and I am in the position where their blame is going to placed on me
because I have sole decision-making, and my son lives with me and spends the large majority of the time with me. I just want to make sure my basis are covered if this does go in front of a judge.
I understand what you are saying but I think you are overcompensating now. I am not a lawyer but my view is objective.
You offered and you offered to facilitate, they rejected, they have not ask you for a reasonable course of action yet.
You cannot hold your ex like a prisoner and force him into march to your direction in the name of your son. Let others do that for you so you are protected.
From what you described you have covered all your bases. An hour with a short and pointed summary in front of a lawyer will give you the legal objectivity you need.
I say take a breath, slow down.