My self rep was a total disaster. The other side "forgot" to include my affidavit in the binder and it was apparent the judge had me pegged as a dead beat before it even began.
This is why lawyers are important and not everyone should self rep. You need to understand the Rules just as well as a lawyer (or better) when you are self-rep.
Ignorantia juris non excusat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You could have filed your own Trial Record and included your affidavit. Not much churns on affidavit evidence as a testamony as both parties are often called to testify
viva voce.
I am anything but. Every point I brought up, including her undisclosed assets and missing financial information didn't seem to matter at all.
What was the access arrangement of the children in question? If it was "every other weekend" then, not much churns on the primary residential parent's income and assets when determining CS and S.7 expenses.
So, your argument was irrelevant to the matters before the court if there is no access or every other weekend "EOW" access to the children in question.
She is a total gold digger with an incredible sense of entitlement and the system seems to encourage it.
I can see why the justice might have had you "pegged".
Calling someone a "gold digger" is probably not the best argument to put forward before the court. In fact, I hope these words never came out of your mouth before the justice at all.
Of course she could afford a lawyer as she makes plenty and brings in cs from 2 guys.
How someone pays for their lawyer is irrelevant to the proceedings. She could have had rich parents and this argument would have failed before the court. The only thing the court is concerned with is Rule 24 of the Children's Law Reform Act... The children's "best interests".
They are going back 4 years as they say I should have been paying towards extraordinary expenses even though the agreement was for cs and medical/dental.
How long did the children in question reside with you? Suffice to say they would have had to establish that you were in an
in loco parent. Clearly if you are as you stated you are "anything but" a dead beat parent one can only assume you have regular access to the children in question and play some role in their life as a parent in loco.
For about 3 years of that time I believe I was overpaying cs by about $100/month if you deducted the fathers payment from my table amount.
That isn't how child support is calculated. If you are a parent then you need to pay Child Support. It is determined based on your income. The other "father's" contributions could have been brought into the equation possibly but, you have to understand the Rules governing CS determinations. For this, you would either need to study the Rules significantly and figure it out or retain counsel to represent you.
I walked out of there owing over 10k. I make less than 40k a year. I will probably have to remortgage my house and they aren't even my kids. I am in shock.
Note the red statement. Yet you stated previously:
... it was apparent the judge had me pegged as a dead beat before it even began. I am anything but.
So are you a parent to these children or are you not a parent to these children?
Good Luck!
Tayken