Cost submissions

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

cynthia10

New member
so got my judgment, I guess I didn`t articulate how uninvolved the ex is as she has ordered everything they wanted...ya dumbfounded right now....EOW for 13 yr old and counseling at my expense.....hello unemployed single mother here and not to mention my older are 18.....
The boys love him and as I said before are neither here nor there about him, he has never ever been involved with them and when they find out about this they will hate him for what he is doing....talk about making something high conflict.....wowowowowowow
So much for being gracious and non combative in court
So I will cry tomorrow....for now how do I do a cost submission and should I even bother......
If I am ordered to pay costs, I have no money and will have to file bankruptcy....will this be covered in a bankruptcy:confused:
 
Cynthia:

I'm so very sorry. What were the reasons that they gave for you to only have EOW access? Was it the voice of the child that contributed to this decision?
 
Oh no sorry I have full custody.....the boys were given the option to see or not 4 yrs ago and it was always no, so ex accused me of alienation but fact is he is and always was uninvolved.At the 1st CC, I agreed to every friday night for 13 yr old then he started to not show up and then I let the 13 yr old decide, it is the ex who now wants EOW, other side 25 min away, he lives with momma caz he and his chicky that he had a baby with 2 years ago split up.......and she the chicky verbally absued my sons yrs ago so in the order my son is not to be brought into contact with them....so now ex who claims that while they do not live together spends every weekend at chickys with the baby...so dumby may have just shot himself in the foot caz now he will miss out on time with him
 
my sediments exactly ......trouble is she already did/does involve the kids in adult matters (tellin lies to kids means mommy really loves them the most )...total parental alienation in the household and wow the venom about the ex and his goil.....typical stuff here
 
theborg said:
Ty hammer this is a family law site or didn't u kno that
Click to expand...

Yes I know. Been here for a few years now. But I still don't see where she stated that she lied to the kids etc. If anything the only thing I see she did wrong was allow the children a choice when they were going to exercise their parenting time contrary to an existing court order when dad became irregular in exercising his parenting time.

Each parents job is to promote the relationship of the children with the other parent. By suggesting they get to choose when they go with the other parent, whether the other parent is consistant with exercising their parenting time, is not promoting the relationship.

But otherwise, you've taken her words and twisted them, which it appears you do. I have a feeling you may have lost in court and now are venting your frustrations......I mean, if you were this prepared for court, I can't understand why you may have not been successful....
 
no sorry I have full custody.....the boys were given the option to see or not 4 yrs ago and it was always no, so ex accused me of alienation but fact is he is and always was uninvolved

that was 4 years ago ....hammer....hohum I win another round
 
I have never involved them at all in the issues....they are 18 and 13 and were given the choice 4 and a half years ago to visit and their answer was always no...he is not and never has been involved, he is not like you guys...he views them s a possession.....they will indeed need to be told why they have to go to counseling....will i be positive of course, but it may mean they miss activites etc...he has had email phone text access and never used it...except to berate my boys and call me names, which I just dismiss please dont misunderstand me
 
so ex accused me of alienation but fact is he is and always was uninvolved
Click to expand...

So you were married to another dude?

So you're one of those types of gay tranny that hates women because we menstruate and you can't?

the boys were given the option to see or not 4 yrs ago and it was always no, so ex accused me of alienation
Click to expand...

So basically you're chastising the OP like a complete hypocrite because you've done even worse things to your own children.

that was 4 years ago ....hammer....hohum I win another round
Click to expand...

I'll bet that you didn't "win" a damned thing. Everything about you indicates that you had a very bad time in family court. Why don't you post your Canlii link so we can all see your big win.
 
theborg said:
"no sorry I have full custody.....the boys were given the option to see or not 4 yrs ago and it was always no, so ex accused me of alienation but fact is he is and always was uninvolved"

that was 4 years ago ....hammer....hohum I win another round
Click to expand...

Win what.....not sure what level your reading comprehension is, but let me dumb it down for you...

Parents should promote other parent.

Giving kids option to not go on parenting is bad.

I hope I didn't use too many big words for you.

I fail to see any where in my post that I suggested otherwise. Or any connection to your statement that she somehow lies to the kids and your last post.

However, given that her ex was successful in his motion, it leads me to believe he did have sufficient evidence to support his case or the OP completely failed to provide sufficient evidence to refute his claims.
 
geez I'v never been uninvolved with wat I assumed was a possession.....I surely wouldn't be so uninvolved I'd be in court about my dis-interest. Cythnia sorry you lost...everyone is supposed to lose in court that way the judge has done his job....court wins are so easy win kids are small.....thats why you try not too throw ur ex under the bus win kids are tiny.....so the ex will have tons of goodwill for you later, when the kids age and things get difficult......call him up tonight and say your sorry for everything...maybe he won't bankrupt you
 
I failed, I was unprepared it happened so fast the trial I mean and I am and was very non-combative.....he is who he is and despite that I have raised my kids to live him anyway, I just thought the judge would see that......now, all hell will break lose and I will pick up the pieces and be their for my sons, but please read my prior posts about how well I treated this man before you guys rip me a new one LOL :)
 
opps bad cut n paste job....but funny u dunbass's think I said that...lol....man pirranha attack everything....read the thread tards!
 
theborg said:
no sorry I have full custody.....the boys were given the option to see or not 4 yrs ago and it was always no, so ex accused me of alienation but fact is he is and always was uninvolved

that was 4 years ago ....hammer....hohum I win another round
Click to expand...

I think I've decoded theborg here to be trying to quote cynthia somehow. She was the one who said the top paragraph in a previous post. Before people further derail the thread arguing.
 
Rioe said:
I think I've decoded theborg here to be trying to quote cynthia somehow. She was the one who said the top paragraph in a previous post. Before people further derail the thread arguing.
Click to expand...

I caught it as I read her posts. Borg tried to quote what she said in an attempt to validate one of his comments and prove me wrong. The issue was, the part he quoted had nothing to do with his previous comment. Further, we were actually (I dare say this) agreeing with each other....he was just too dumb to realize it....
 
Yes cynthia10's quote was taken out of context and attributed to borg. @Borg: HammerDad has FORGOTTEN more things than you will EVER know. Total Jackass!! Or to quote you: a Total "dunbass." I just love learning new words.

Cynthia I can give you some direction on costs submissions. It might help. Also, on a couple of other things. PM me.
 
Last edited:
submissions won't help...she's got no money........the judge knows it ..thats the beauty about being "difficult" with no cash-ola......the ability to get away with stuff and leave nothin but destruction around....I'd appeal the decision..it's another free ride
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top