standing on the sidelines
New member
occupational rent an option here???
Blink, this is actually a good point you make and a question I have. As you say she is well within her rights to reopen equalization issue, then I guess my husband can do the same? As I mentioned earlier, he was trying to be cooperative by signing the papers for her to get her new house. At the time, I asked him, 'do you not want to ask for anything at all from the house?' He left with nothing. Large, nice, 3 bedroom house fully furnished, BBQ, lawn mower, snow blower, you name it, she got it all! He was trying to be nice at the time, but if she can reopen this, then can he go back and make a claim for all the things he left?
You are entitled to your opinion. Would you feel the same if she felt like living in that house for 10 years under this agreement and he would owe her 10 years of back support? Again, don't think people should renig on the deals they make. He would have never agreed to this at the time. Also, the numbers I used were just examples. He paid double what his support should have been. But I do enjoy hearing all your opinions!
Hello all. Have not written in awhile but thought some of you may be interested to know that my husband had a settlement conference today regarding this issue and some other things. The judge sided with him and agreed that she did not pay occupational rent and he did in fact overpay her. At most, the judge suggested that he would only have to pay back the PRINCIPLE that was paid on the mortgage at that time (his half). Once you factor in her lack of rent and his over payments, she actually owes him money, not that he has ever asked for it or even plans to. Hope this helps if anyone is in a similar situation. Funny that she was trying to get $17000 from him when she in fact owes him! What we thought all along! Also the judge mentioned the rent issue first before our lawyer even could!