Breastfeeding

[Tayken]

No worries, I'd wager my comprehension skills against yours any day of the week

I wouldn't wager anyone's comprehension skills are better on a public message forum. All you can comprehend is what someone chooses to disclose. Everything else anyone shares as an opinion is an interpretation and not a comprehension in my honest opinion.

So, you are saying as a reader/poster, before responding to any post it would be wise to check the OP history and read all past posts/references/contributions before you reply to the thread?

Yes, it is wise. It is also wise to do when a poster is making negative inferences against you on this message board. Just like an affidavit trapped in a continuing record the contributions of posters to this forum can expose a lot.

Then perhaps, if you followed your own assvice, you wouldn't have posted/accused the OP of this:

Not sure why you haven't chosen to call me out on my "assvice" as well as WO in the matter.

It has been fairly apparent from the get-go, if you had reviewed her past threads, that the OP was not breastfeeding an infant that was a participant in an ongoing family law file.

The argument presented is that no child should be dragged into a court of law. Especially an infant. You can disagree with the position taken by WO and others (including myself).

You are offended because I didn't read your past threads? Yet, you don't make the same efforts that you are demanding of me. By the way, your spelling is becoming fairly inconsistent and not as Convenance to read.

Your spelling on the other hand is directed and made with possibly malice intent. For example the writing of "assvice". Honest spelling mistakes are tolerable but, creating new words to insult people is transparent and doesn't put you in the best light in my honest opinion. It isn't clever and insightful.

Good Luck!
Tayken