BC girls murdered on Christmas /custody dispute

Status
Not open for further replies.
arabian said:
The bottom line is what happened to those children is very, very sad.
Click to expand...

From the very first moment that mom denied them access to their dad.

We discussed this, and can be discussed again, I don't have an issue with women, just some very particular woman.
 
trinton said:
I disagree. The father has my full sympathy. I don't blame him at all given his situation - and completely blame the mother and our family law legal system - and the judge (for not giving him 50/50). I would love to see more of this when father's are denied 50/50. I do feel bad for the children but am sure they are happier now then they would have been in given the mizerable situation the judge setup for their father. If their father is being painted and setup as a criminal having to pay a price- then he might as well be one.

Mother is a monster - a control freak - and a golddigger - wants sole custody and limit fathers access and have child returned at 6:30 PM and full guideline child support. If the father is to be a monster - then he is a monster that was created by the mother and the judge.

Mother did in fact get sole custody - I never understood this whole "the father can motion to reverse a decisions he doesn't agree with " non sense. What ....mother makes a decision for surgery for the child and the father has to file a motion to be heard few months later to put back the child's tonsils that were taken out months ago? Or to de-inject a needle that was injected months ago ? Give me a f**cking break -- mom HAD sole custody. Now she's got nothing and I'm laughing. Spit in her face.

Restraining order against the father - really? Come on now Arabian. I am not even surprised given your posting history re: women's shelter homes.

God bless this father for making some noise and pushing for family law reform - not to cut fathers out right off the bat based on false and merit-less allegations of abuse solely intended to cut the father out - but to start with 50/50 right off the bat.


Father's actions were spontaneous given the judge's order for mom to have sole custody, and dad very limited access, and to pay an arm, a leg, and his spine for child support.

False allegations of abuse are a norm in family law, and can't automatically assumed to be true just because the father did something really bad after the fact. To be frank, a lot of us dad's here had some sort of bizzare FALSE alllegation thrown at us - wasn't LF32 accused of sticking his finger up his child's anus by mom and OCL or something like that ?
Click to expand...



I can't even believe I am reading this. :eek:
 
ensorcelled said:
I can't even believe I am reading this. :eek:
Click to expand...

You best do - because the father was a normal person that just ended up going crazy.

Did you not see the normal wealthy educated man in Vegas that went crazy and shot everybody ? Or the personal injury lawyer who recently went crazy and assaulted someone in a parking lot calling them ISIS ?

Normal people can go crazy - and that is what happened to the father in that case. I don't believe any of that would have happened had the mother not been so against the father and had the courts not imposed each and every single thing the mother wanted onto the father - and set out joint custody and equal access with child support obligation on BOTH parents.

I really do congratulate the mom on her "win"- I really do.

Who's there to say mom wouldn't have killed her own kids had the father been given sole custody and mom very limited access and child support to dad in excess of $1000 ? Cuz only dads murder their own children right ? Did you ever heard of this mom who kills her own kids in an oven?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/report...-in-oven-called-their-father-over-video-chat/
 
Last edited:
trinton said:
For as long as the members will rip on fathers - I will rip on mothers.
Click to expand...

Nobody is "ripping on fathers". The discussion is about the actions of one man.

Should you wish to comment or offer your opinion in the same vein, then feel free. If your posts are for the sole purpose of being offensive and "ripping on mothers" then please refrain from posting at all as that is not the purpose of this site.

Your cooperation is appreciated.
 
trinton said:
You best do - because the father was a normal person that just ended up going crazy.

Did you not see the normal wealthy educated man in Vegas that went crazy and shot everybody ? Or the personal injury lawyer who recently went crazy and assaulted someone in a parking lot calling them ISIS ?

Normal people can go crazy - and that is what happened to the father in that case. I don't believe any of that would have happened had the mother not been so against the father and had the courts not imposed each and every single thing the mother wanted onto the father - and set out joint custody and equal access with child support obligation on BOTH parents.

I really do congratulate the mom on her "win"- I really do.

Who's there to say mom wouldn't have killed her own kids had the father been given sole custody and mom very limited access and child support to dad in excess of $1000 ? Cuz only dads murder their own children right ? Did you ever heard of this mom who kills her own kids in an oven?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/report...-in-oven-called-their-father-over-video-chat/
Click to expand...

I can't even believe what I'm reading. Please exit this post ASAP. Your comments are absurd.
 
blinkandimgone said:
Nobody is "ripping on fathers". The discussion is about the actions of one man.
Click to expand...

Well, based on your post below, me having a discussion of the actions and reliefs sought of one mom here is found to be offensive to every single mom.

blinkandimgone said:
Trinton, your posts are becoming increasingly disturbing and offensive. Please dial it back.
Click to expand...

Please don't associate my comments about one mom with every single mom out there, and I won't view your comments as you ripping on men and being biased against men. If that is why you are on this site - to be over protective of women and to view a comment about a single mom offensive to every single mom in the world, then I don't think that is what this site is for.

PS. what is the ratio of men you have banned vs. women on this site?
 
ensorcelled said:
I can't even believe what I'm reading. Please exit this post ASAP. Your comments are absurd.
Click to expand...

Hey, you are the one that posted the father was a bad man right from the get go and the judge screwed up by saying that "it was hoped he would be a good parent..."

Just know that it's not only father's that do things like this...

Look at this: Mom Kills Husband's Girlfriend Then Shoots Her 2 Children and Herself in Murder-Suicide

Murder-Suicide: Mom Kills Husband's Girlfriend, 2 Kids | PEOPLE.com
 
blinkandimgone said:
Zero to zero. Thanks for asking.
Click to expand...

That would mean you have never banned anybody. You do realize you have banned me 3 times now in the last couple months right ? And If I am not mistaken, it was also you who banned LF32 a while back just because he was, well, a loving father.

Please communicate accurate and honest figures to the members of the forum.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.
 
Should you wish to discuss administrative actions and feel you are entitled to do so, feel free to do so in private with Jeff.

I have never banned you, LF32 or anyone else. Ever.

You've been advised to refrain from your offensive posts. The choice is yours.

Thank you.
 
trinton said:
Hey, you are the one that posted the father was a bad man right from the get go and the judge screwed up by saying that "it was hoped he would be a good parent..."

Just know that it's not only father's that do things like this...

Look at this: Mom Kills Husband's Girlfriend Then Shoots Her 2 Children and Herself in Murder-Suicide

Murder-Suicide: Mom Kills Husband's Girlfriend, 2 Kids | PEOPLE.com
Click to expand...

None of the two news articles you have posted are alike in any way to the BC case.

It's like posting an article on the Mason family to make a larger point about blended families.

Two little girls are DEAD. The mother was trying to protect them from their father for years. No massaging of his ego, 50-50 or 'equality' as you're adamant about would have saved them. It's sad and absurd but this is not the first time in 2017 that we read about women not being believed when making claims about men (see, #metoo).
 
Your post has been removed due to posting of private messages which isn't allowed.

As well, you've already been told if you want to have a discussion on administrative policy and actions, please feel free to do so in private with Jeff.

-Blink
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ensorcelled said:
None of the two news articles you have posted are alike in any way to the BC case.

It's like posting an article on the Mason family to make a larger point about blended families.

Two little girls are DEAD. The mother was trying to protect them from their father for years. No massaging of his ego, 50-50 or 'equality' as you're adamant about would have saved them. It's sad and absurd but this is not the first time in 2017 that we read about women not being believed when making claims about men (see, #metoo).
Click to expand...

Please refrain from making such generic comments about men. You read what the moderator said in an earlier post.

The father would have not become crazy and hurt his children had the mom not been marginalizing him as a parent for all those years you have talked about.

You keep trying to paint this as a men thing, meanwhile, women are also killing their children as a result of custody disputes.
 
Unfortunately, there is no way to ban a member from posting in a thread.

trinton - please no longer post in this thread, or I will have to ban you from the forums.
 
The father had 10 overnights in a 28 day period as well as 4 other days with non overnight parenting time. That means he had parenting time on 50 % of the days even if 4 days were not overnight. My point is that he had regular contact with his children, not just a couple of hours supervised. I fail to see how this can be spun as the father feeling depressed and hopeless because he did not have time with the children.

Under no circumstances can not having exactly 50% somehow justify his actions.
 
PeacefulMoments said:
The father had 10 overnights in a 28 day period as well as 4 other days with non overnight parenting time. That means he had parenting time on 50 % of the days even if 4 days were not overnight. My point is that he had regular contact with his children, not just a couple of hours supervised. I fail to see how this can be spun as the father feeling depressed and hopeless because he did not have time with the children.

Under no circumstances can not having exactly 50% somehow justify his actions.
Click to expand...



10 in a 28 day period ... so 1/3rd or rather, 30% - starting to sound a lot like Ange's case... He is good enough for 39.99% but not for 40%.

That's now how time is counted. Overnight is a big deal, and a very important thing. Otherwise, supervised access could be counted as day access too.

He didn't get what he wanted after all these years, was ordered ot pay excess of $1000 a month of child support, mom's legal costs, no custody, and was just doomed.

This man would not have done this if he had won his case, and mom was ordered to pay his costs. It could have been quite possible that mom would have killed the kids in that scenario.
 
Jeff said:
Done!



At least you'll have some accounts agreeing with you.
Click to expand...

Thanks! Suppose you could charge me for 0.45 of an hour for that. I'll be sure to pay without forcing you through the assessment officer.

I have loads of accounts agreeing with me. They like to stay off these motherly warmed threads to avoid critisim for standing up for dad's and for being banned for exercising their freedom of speech rights. This wouldn't be the first thread majority of male / impartial posters avoid posting on.


I don't blame you.. you wouldn't want to piss of mom's.. theyre probably your best customers and have higher chance of being successful in court.

Anyway, take your attitude / professional conduct and stick it under a snow mat .. right beside your miserable loses against lawyers like mine on Canlii. It may even " win" you another LSUC complaint courtesy of ODF.

oh and There are other accounts I have, which I will lay low with. I will be here but will be invisible.

I win.. I double win.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top