Much appreciate the light speed responses.
To further clarify, mom is agreeable to med arb for financial reasons in spite of the financial backing of her wealthy family.
I highly recommend you not focus on this topic ("wealthy family") as you will be hard pressed to find any sitting judge in my honest and personal opinion that will hear you out on that topic. In fact, you may find yourself in a lot of hot water if you attempt to even leverage this as an argument before the court.
I actually suggested a clinical psychologist to med arb the custody and access issues and a lawyer to med arb the financials. However mom declined as she is concerned with a psychologist med arguing the kids' issues and she wants a lawyer to med arb everything and using that as an excuse.
The logic doesn't seem to work though does it? If the children truly do have issues such as a diagnosis on the Autistic spectrum wouldn't a clinical psychologist be the most appropriate person to mediate and arbitrate the matter?
Note:
I truly hope you are telling the truth about the diagnosis on the Autistic Spectrum for the child in question and there is undeniable "evidence based medicine" supporting this diagnosis from registered and practicing medical doctors.
Your recommendation is great Tayken as dr Landau seems to be Botha psychologist and a lawyer.
Not only that but, she has litterally written the book on Collaborative Law. Has been awarded some of the highest honours for her efforts in bringing forward mediation and arbitration as a viable means to resolving Family Law Disputes. She is also incredibly well known in the legal community and equally in the medical community for her efforts.
I currently have a junior lawyer whom I primarily retained for her OCL experience.
Do note that the cost of hiring a senior solicitor is significantly more than what you are probably paying now. It could be triple to double the hourly rate you are paying. Be very mindful of that fact.
Can you elaborate or point to the experience of another forum member re obtaining the CAS records?
Other than it is a struggle, will take possibly a number appearances before the court and that you have to present an argument based on facts and a clear reason as to why you need these records... That is about all I can share.
The question is am I better off with Phil Epstein as a lawyer or as an arbitrator?
I highly recommend you research the rate prior to even making the determination in both situations.
Seems my best bet is dr Landau to med arb and Phil Epstein to counsel ?
That was my recommendation but, you need to SERIOUSLY consider the funds you have available to do so.
I often cite senior lawyer hourly billables to be around $500 (or more than) per hour.
A two hour consult with a senior solicitor is $1000. Your matter is so complex as you have presented it would be my personal opinion it would take a senior solicitor probably no less than 5 solid days just to get up to speed on your file.
5 days * 7.5 hours a day = 37.5 hours
At a bill rate of $500 an hour you are looking at possible up-front retainer of about $18,750 + pst and disbursements (another $1000 possibly) just to get the lawyer up to speed on the matter.
So please do seriously consider what you are proposing.
I highly recommend you to significant research on the topic of "relevance" in family law and law in general. The more you educate yourself on this topic the less you will have to spend in legals.
I suggest this because you made allegations and alluded to the wealth of the other party's family which is irrelevant in my humble opinion in any matter before the family court. Present this argument to a senior solicitor and see what feedback they provide to you on the topic and if they would even present that argument before the court... Then, consider you were paying $500 an hour to possibly be told it was irrelevant to a custody and access dispute where the children's "best interests" are the primary focus of any argument.
and do I want to go the arb or the trial route given my circumstances ? A con with trial is prolonging the status quo with mom as primary caregiver based on a consent order which we did 1 year ago after she moved out as she agreed for the OCL to be involved.
Clearly you have not read the case law I provided and requested you read 12 times yet. I suggest you read the case law I provided 12 times then answer your own question regarding "status quo".
nhowever the OCL first rejected our case and they only took it after another court endorsement following the case conference.
Irrelivant and not an important detail. The OCL did get involved and a report was produced. That is the relevant topic that you need to deal with and forgo this argument or any investigation into it in my honest opinion. Again, ask a senior lawyer what their opinion is on this statement and if there is any guidance they can provide. I am doubtful that they would even bother.
Btw regarding alienation issues the OCL established which had been happening for years namely that Mom makes disparaging comments to the kids about me. However it did not seem to bother them the same with the locking int he rooms until nighttime as per the kids.it took the CAS to resolve that.
Careful as to what you may "feel" is parental alienation and how the OCL report presents the topic. I highly recommend you seek out a senior solicitor or do significant research on the topic prior to making any allegation of "alienation" against the other parent.
Another concern with her sole custody is that is is planning to take off to another country of much lower standards and this would be a life sentence for all 3 kids and especially for our autistic son.yes aware that mobility is a different issue but regardless.
The key points to focus on are in my opinion:
1. Was this information regarding the change of residential location disclosed to the OCL at the time of the investigation or is this a recent development?
2. Mobility such as this changes the game significantly. Use the "Search" function on this forum and search "Mobility" to see the incredibly complex matter and how they are determined by the court.
Here is the basics on the defining jurisprudence (case law) on mobility of children in Canada:
Gordon v. Goertz - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gordon v. Goertz, [1996] 2 SCR 27
Date: 1996-05-02
Docket: 24622
Parallel citations: 1996 CanLII 191 (SCC); 134 DLR (4th) 321; [1996] 5 WWR 457; 19 RFL (4th) 177; 141 Sask R 241
URL:
CanLII - 1996 CanLII 191 (SCC)
As of today's date this case law has been sited over 1800 times in CanLII in other matters regarding the mobility of children.
Will read the case much appreciated
Imwouldmlike to thank you for your guidance from the bottom of my heart, our children is really all thatnimthink about and frankly if mom had been different (no anger, patience, autism knowledge and positive disciplining) I would have had no problem with even sole to her. money is not an issue for me, I voluntarily started paying her SS when I separated in the same house and later when she moved without a court order on this which 3 years later we still do not have.
It is highly doubtful that the other parent has "
no anger, patience, autism knowledge and positive disciplining" abilities. This is a very *absolute* statement of the other parent.
I highly recommend you read this thread and the links provided in addition to the other materials provided 12 times and seriously re-think this kind of statement.
http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f3/introducing-very-honourable-madame-justice-mossip-13753/
A statement such as what you have made to this forum regarding the other parent made to a court of competent jurisdiction may not be received by the justice in the same light as you want to present it.
Furthermore, might I suggest that through your own disclosures provided to this very forum the OCL investigator made similar observations of you as a parent possibly. I have no knowledge of what is contained in the OCL report other than what you have disclosed to this public forum but, having seen many OCL and Section 30 reports, they all follow a similar pattern and I am only making this sweeping assumption based on this knowledge and no knowledge of your direct matters. (other than what you have chosen to disclose on this forum).
Good Luck!
Tayken
PS: If you do retain a senior solicitor in the matter you are discussing I highly recommend you provide them a link to this thread and get some feedback from them regarding the information that has been provided to you with regards to the allegations you have made on this site regarding the other parent.