Killer Divorce Strategies in Family Law, Divorce Attorneys | WinningCourtStrategies.com
Found this website and thought I would share some insights that may make us more angry or at least support what we already believe:
GENERALLY CONFERENCES ARE A COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME
Generally conferences are a complete waste of time and only serves to waste the courts and litigants time. And most lawyers and judges will say that only about 5-7% of all cases go to trial. They make it appear as if the conferences have a lot to do with settlements but in fact why most cases are settled out of court is that the litigants don’t have money to go to trial or to a motion and therefore, acquiesce to status quo. .....
Judges don’t like to see matters go to trial because they are proud to say and hang their hats on the fact that less than 5% of cases go to trial. The use of such a term is so misleading because it really doesn’t do justice to families, children and makes everyone believe that judges and lawyers have accomplished something very significant. This concept is so far from the truth and it is outrageous. What the judges and lawyers don’t tell you is that the entire legal system pins one spouse against the other and uses the power of suggestion in attempts to get one party to concede the issues.
......
And yes, Judges walk all over people’s legal rights every day in our family courts because they can and have the vested powers to do so. So those who get really cocky will undoubtedly get bad orders and thereby bad outcomes. Even if you a good person but you look shanty, yes you may also get the bad order because of your looks. So consequently most lawyers and or litigants are very much intimidated by the presiding judge and will end up playing the game of cat and mouse and enter into the highest level of manipulation to affect the outcome in their clients best interest.
...
Certain Judges have certain tendencies to lean or bias the outcome before a litigant has a fair chance at presenting their case. Consequently in some cases the court orders are stacked one upon another, to effectively discredit the intended litigant. Attacking ones credibility is what a lawsuit involves much of the time and lawyers love discrediting a litigant. Attacking ones credibility is done by design. So the more court orders that are made against one litigant the less credibility they have in courts view and are probably viewed by the presiding judge as a trouble maker. If your credibility is in question , the next time you attend court the opposing lawyer doesn’t even have open his or her mouth and the presiding judge has already got your number. Once your credibility is shot anytime you appear in court that litigant will not usually fair good and rest is history in the making.
(sorry--this probably is the wrong forum .....
Found this website and thought I would share some insights that may make us more angry or at least support what we already believe:
GENERALLY CONFERENCES ARE A COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME
Generally conferences are a complete waste of time and only serves to waste the courts and litigants time. And most lawyers and judges will say that only about 5-7% of all cases go to trial. They make it appear as if the conferences have a lot to do with settlements but in fact why most cases are settled out of court is that the litigants don’t have money to go to trial or to a motion and therefore, acquiesce to status quo. .....
Judges don’t like to see matters go to trial because they are proud to say and hang their hats on the fact that less than 5% of cases go to trial. The use of such a term is so misleading because it really doesn’t do justice to families, children and makes everyone believe that judges and lawyers have accomplished something very significant. This concept is so far from the truth and it is outrageous. What the judges and lawyers don’t tell you is that the entire legal system pins one spouse against the other and uses the power of suggestion in attempts to get one party to concede the issues.
......
And yes, Judges walk all over people’s legal rights every day in our family courts because they can and have the vested powers to do so. So those who get really cocky will undoubtedly get bad orders and thereby bad outcomes. Even if you a good person but you look shanty, yes you may also get the bad order because of your looks. So consequently most lawyers and or litigants are very much intimidated by the presiding judge and will end up playing the game of cat and mouse and enter into the highest level of manipulation to affect the outcome in their clients best interest.
...
Certain Judges have certain tendencies to lean or bias the outcome before a litigant has a fair chance at presenting their case. Consequently in some cases the court orders are stacked one upon another, to effectively discredit the intended litigant. Attacking ones credibility is what a lawsuit involves much of the time and lawyers love discrediting a litigant. Attacking ones credibility is done by design. So the more court orders that are made against one litigant the less credibility they have in courts view and are probably viewed by the presiding judge as a trouble maker. If your credibility is in question , the next time you attend court the opposing lawyer doesn’t even have open his or her mouth and the presiding judge has already got your number. Once your credibility is shot anytime you appear in court that litigant will not usually fair good and rest is history in the making.
(sorry--this probably is the wrong forum .....