User CP
New posts
Advertising
|
Divorce & Family Law This forum is for discussing any of the legal issues involved in your divorce. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Private arbitration judges cost anywhere from $400-$600 per hour or more, and you could easily be looking at 40 hours because you also pay for "thinking time". Don't forget that you still need your lawyer. Arbitration is a game for the wealthy. Better to have the taxpayer funded judge. Bonus: arbitration awards can be easily appealed, just like court. Actually, it is likely easier to appeal an arbitration ruling than a court ruling, so that adds even more to the potential cost. TLDR: Unless you are rich and you care for some reason about speed of judgement, use the free judge. Quote:
![]() Quote:
She may have been a useless sludge. but even in clear cases it is tough to get an unequal split of the matrimonial home. Your case, as the saying goes, is clear as mud. You are not getting that unequal split. |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Good points Janus. It is worth noting that Arbitration differs province to province. My divorce was in Alberta and arbitrator was a judge (paid for by tax payers). Arbitration was turned into Order by same judge, in courtroom 1 hour after decision.
Hopefully this poster can come to agreement on consent and avoid court altogether. Might be useful for both he and his wife to complete a mock financial disclosure process that they would have to go through for Arbitration or court by simple printing out and completing the appropriate forms (readily available on internet). In addition, they could have the family accountant prepare financial statement. Equalization would be quite simple with full financial disclosure. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I do not think most people here are belligerent, at least I do not think you are. From the get go when you posted your replies to my post I knew that you're trying to play the role of the critic to help me sharpen my arguments when I need to. It's all in the "tone" of the written words that intentions are revealed. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Family court is a court of law based on facts, and in my opinion is not a court of justice, it is not about what's fair and what's not fair. It is simply laws supported by facts. Therefore, I believe offering sought advice in this great forum to people based entirely on the information s/he provides within the Family Law realm is the best way to help. It is irrelevant what vibe you may feel about a person or what you may think about her/his intentions. By offering advice from your own experience based solely on how the Family Law was applied in your case is priceless to the many souls seeking help here.
|
![]() |
Tags |
matrimonial home, shared equity, unjust enrichment |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CS, S7, SS - big increase in income | seeker101 | Financial Issues | 27 | 04-17-2018 10:01 AM |
Faulty to assume Shared Parenting: here's why | SilverLining | Divorce & Family Law | 44 | 06-29-2014 01:41 PM |
Interesting Article on Joint Custody | Grace | Political Issues | 23 | 03-20-2012 10:35 AM |
Shared Parenting | first timer | Parenting Issues | 0 | 03-20-2011 12:08 AM |
Separation agreement questions - shared custody, sharing CCTB/UCCB, am I being fair? | Aelon | Financial Issues | 15 | 07-12-2010 06:46 PM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 AM.