Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Urgent Motion -> Nesting

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Urgent Motion -> Nesting

    Source: Epstein?s This Week in Family Law | Interim custody | WestlawNext Canada Portal

    By: Philip Epstein

    Veljanovski v. Veljanovski, 2015 CarswellOnt 9263 (Ont. S.C.J.): On either party’s version, they both had been separated but still lived together in the matrimonial home for a considerable period of time. The parties had two children, aged 5-1/2 and almost 4 years. Both parents sought interim custody and both parties argued that the matter was urgent and that tensions in the home were starting to rise. Justice Rogin of the Superior Court of Justice took a very careful look at the parts of the evidence that were uncontested. Since this was an interim motion and the parties had not been cross-examined, the learned Justice had restricted himself to that part of the evidence. This is a heavily factually based case and these kinds of cases virtually always turn on their facts and not the law.
    Excellent read. Case law is not on CanLII yet.

    Good Luck!
    Tayken
Our Divorce Forums
Forums dedicated to helping people all across Canada get through the separation and divorce process, with discussions about legal issues, parenting issues, financial issues and more.
Working...
X