After speaking to the Manager of the court (she could not quote a rule or law that states why I was not able to obtain the Settlement Conference Transcript) she told me that it was by direction of the Head Justice that Transcripts not be available. and that it would require a Judges Order to obtain a transcript) The manager of the court gave me the court registrars name and told me to speak to her. I called she is off till Monday
I was no further ahead. I also called the Ministry of the Attorney General and they said to email them with my concerns, but I stressed urgency and time was at a premium.
So I guess I have to wait until Monday
Meanwhile I obtained the Judges Endorsement....
Summary (from what I can make out)..
Applicants Lawyer and court notified that I would not be attending.
The applicant and the court are frustrated by my non-attendance.
It mentions the first settlement conference and the conflict with a Drs appointment and the letter from my GP and the health concerns
The court gives the benefit of the doubt and will put this matter over one more time to (the date) end of July. for a trial Management Conference. This matter cannot languish in these courts any longer.
Judges Signature
Does this all sound right?
Does the Head Justice rule on publications?
Or is this just a whitewash....
Do I really need a Judges Order to have a copy of something that the Applicant , the Applicant's Lawyer, and the Judge are privy too?
In the Judges Order it is stated that the Judge heard and read submissions from the Applicant.... no mention of my submissions in written form.
Thanks everyone for letting me bounce my frustration
I appreciate any advice. Thank you once again,
Yours truly,
Mcbroke
I was no further ahead. I also called the Ministry of the Attorney General and they said to email them with my concerns, but I stressed urgency and time was at a premium.
So I guess I have to wait until Monday
Meanwhile I obtained the Judges Endorsement....
Summary (from what I can make out)..
Applicants Lawyer and court notified that I would not be attending.
The applicant and the court are frustrated by my non-attendance.
It mentions the first settlement conference and the conflict with a Drs appointment and the letter from my GP and the health concerns
The court gives the benefit of the doubt and will put this matter over one more time to (the date) end of July. for a trial Management Conference. This matter cannot languish in these courts any longer.
Judges Signature
Does this all sound right?
Does the Head Justice rule on publications?
Or is this just a whitewash....
Do I really need a Judges Order to have a copy of something that the Applicant , the Applicant's Lawyer, and the Judge are privy too?
In the Judges Order it is stated that the Judge heard and read submissions from the Applicant.... no mention of my submissions in written form.
Thanks everyone for letting me bounce my frustration
I appreciate any advice. Thank you once again,
Yours truly,
Mcbroke
Comment