Originally posted by trinton
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
cross-motion affidavits ?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Beachnana View PostI believe that daycare is not a section 7allowable expense if it’s being used for the purpose of going to work or attending school.
Therefore if Mom is available in the mornings and chooses to put the child into daycare rather than allow the other parent to look after them then the child is,not in daycare for the purposes of work or school therefore it is not a section 7 expense.
Usually if you are receiving subsidize daycare you have to prove you are going to work or attending school. Usually it’s a very tightly controlled schedule. You have daycare for the hours of work and travel. If you call in sick the. Daycare is not covered. If you messa round with your daycare hours they will cut you off subsidized care.
So if Mom is putting child in daycare and as you suggest not going to work she will not be able to claim that daycare as a section 7.
You can ask for her work schedule and proof that the child attended daycare due to her actually going to work.
Remember camps in March Break, Summer etc can also be used under section 7. Umbrella.
I agree with your argument though. She's not even using for purpose of work. just so she can sleep in the mornings.
Comment
-
-
-
Still cannot claim as section 7if using for any other purpose than going to work or attending school
Comment
-
Originally posted by OrleansLawyer View PostGenerally, subsidized daycare must be used. There are a certain number of allowed "missed" days per year, after which the parent with the subsidy pays for the daycare they didn't use. It also puts the entire subsidy at risk.
Other parent is wanting to share those costs for missed days, which have totalled like 300 through the year. It does put subsidy at risk and so they use it to limit my access.
Thoughts ?
Comment
-
Other parent is wanting to share those costs for missed days, which have totalled like 300 through the year.
a lawyer knows
Everything said in this, and any other, message is not intended to be taken as legal advice. I do not hold myself out to be a lawyer, adult or literate. Any resemblance this or any other message may have to legal advice or common sense is entirely coincidental. This message was generated through the combination of a monkey hitting a keyboard with a rock and advanced spell check software.
Comment
-
A combination of me and other parent having access when child is to be at daycare, as per subsidy requirements.
A more complicated formula/method could be worked out through reasonable negotiations (such as who gets to burn through how many days, and each parent is responsible for cost beyond that, for example).
Comment
Comment