STBX and I have great relationship.
He has proposed new method of computed CS based on actuals. It departs from the published FCSG. He has invested a lot of effort in it.
He is a CA who is at times a bit compulsive, so I trust his accuracy and assumptions.
He makes more than me, so our income ratio split becomes 56/44.
Some questions re CS for children in university.
The new amounts result in lower CS numbers overall - "suprisingly"
One kid lives with him and one with me when not in university so we have split custody.
The net to me is about 200 / month.
We are of course splitting the tuition, books, res, sundries using our ratios.
He will not pay CS when child is in residence even though I have a bedroom and pay more costs than the room.
e.g: I just spend about 1000 on bedding some new clothes, groceries, a fridge. The STBX says that this is covered by the CS (even though this is about 200 / month net).
1) Shouldnt this be a section 7 expense?
2) Should the CS be zero when the kid is away?
3) Is an innovative new method for computing CS (one that departs from the published FCSG) OK? He has threatened to go to court to ask a judge to enforce this new CS computation. What would happen to him if he did this. Its not worth the cost to fight it, but I am curious.
(PLEASE NO RANTERS WHO WANT TO TALK ABOUT KIDS PAYING THEIR OWN WAY!!!)
He has proposed new method of computed CS based on actuals. It departs from the published FCSG. He has invested a lot of effort in it.
He is a CA who is at times a bit compulsive, so I trust his accuracy and assumptions.
He makes more than me, so our income ratio split becomes 56/44.
Some questions re CS for children in university.
The new amounts result in lower CS numbers overall - "suprisingly"
One kid lives with him and one with me when not in university so we have split custody.
The net to me is about 200 / month.
We are of course splitting the tuition, books, res, sundries using our ratios.
He will not pay CS when child is in residence even though I have a bedroom and pay more costs than the room.
e.g: I just spend about 1000 on bedding some new clothes, groceries, a fridge. The STBX says that this is covered by the CS (even though this is about 200 / month net).
1) Shouldnt this be a section 7 expense?
2) Should the CS be zero when the kid is away?
3) Is an innovative new method for computing CS (one that departs from the published FCSG) OK? He has threatened to go to court to ask a judge to enforce this new CS computation. What would happen to him if he did this. Its not worth the cost to fight it, but I am curious.
(PLEASE NO RANTERS WHO WANT TO TALK ABOUT KIDS PAYING THEIR OWN WAY!!!)
Comment