Tweet
I was hoping that someone can clarify the Support Tables.
ie: Woman (Y) has a 3 year old meets and moves in with X and they have a child together. The three year old never met there father. X and Y separate after 3 years and they both live in Ontario. Y and X have a court order that X is to pay child support for the two children at 80% of the Federal Guideline (Ontario) $1000 a month. the 80% was based because the three year old's father who is now 6 was to pay $100 a month. Now X takes both children every weekend for visitation, even takes both of them on holidays, parties. The child calls X daddy ever since he came into the picture.
So now that the child is much older he has been a handful to both parents. But X wants nothing to do with him since he is not "a good boy". One question was brought up is when your natural child is not a good child are you going to throw them away too. Anyway mom when separated moved to the Quebec side and X always stayed in Ontario. Y asked for X to increase child support after 10 years. Apparently X's salary tripled in the last ten years. So X applied to the courts in Quebec that he wants his stepchild off and not to pay support for them because he was never this child's father. And X want's child support to be based on the Quebec guidelines for his other child and not the federal guidelines. I have to tell you that in the agreement it is written that he is in loco parentis for this child.
My research shows that a: this guy has been seeing his non biological child for ten years every weekend and now that this child is acting up like every normal child does X wants nothing to do with this child. b: X new that each year he should of increased child support since his salary was going up and up but never did anything. I guess he figured well Y isn't asking so why should I divulge anything. c: X has never lived in Quebec and the child support order is a court order in Ontario which states 80% of the Federal Guidelines for two children.
So now the question is this why would he hire a Quebec lawyer and petition to pay the Quebec guidelines and not the Federal. I saw in Canlaw that parents that live in two provinces they use the federal guideline. Is this guy different?
ie: Woman (Y) has a 3 year old meets and moves in with X and they have a child together. The three year old never met there father. X and Y separate after 3 years and they both live in Ontario. Y and X have a court order that X is to pay child support for the two children at 80% of the Federal Guideline (Ontario) $1000 a month. the 80% was based because the three year old's father who is now 6 was to pay $100 a month. Now X takes both children every weekend for visitation, even takes both of them on holidays, parties. The child calls X daddy ever since he came into the picture.
So now that the child is much older he has been a handful to both parents. But X wants nothing to do with him since he is not "a good boy". One question was brought up is when your natural child is not a good child are you going to throw them away too. Anyway mom when separated moved to the Quebec side and X always stayed in Ontario. Y asked for X to increase child support after 10 years. Apparently X's salary tripled in the last ten years. So X applied to the courts in Quebec that he wants his stepchild off and not to pay support for them because he was never this child's father. And X want's child support to be based on the Quebec guidelines for his other child and not the federal guidelines. I have to tell you that in the agreement it is written that he is in loco parentis for this child.
My research shows that a: this guy has been seeing his non biological child for ten years every weekend and now that this child is acting up like every normal child does X wants nothing to do with this child. b: X new that each year he should of increased child support since his salary was going up and up but never did anything. I guess he figured well Y isn't asking so why should I divulge anything. c: X has never lived in Quebec and the child support order is a court order in Ontario which states 80% of the Federal Guidelines for two children.
So now the question is this why would he hire a Quebec lawyer and petition to pay the Quebec guidelines and not the Federal. I saw in Canlaw that parents that live in two provinces they use the federal guideline. Is this guy different?
Comment