Did some searching but couldn't find any case law where a judge decided that an activity like basic soccer was considered ordinary and not "special". Anyone have some case law they can share for this?
For the past 6 years we have agreed to share costs 50/50 for hockey, soccer and summer camp (about $1000 total costs each year) because we have defined these as ordinary expenses and we have a 50/50 shared custody situation.
Now in court the Ex has decided she won't support these activities anymore financially. She says she will take the child but not pay for the activities.
Will the judge make her pay 50% or proportional to our incomes? Her income is zero because she quit her job because she is too depressed to work. So let's assume the judge agrees with her because if an income is imputed I know the result of proportional splitting expenses but really would like to know about 50/50 sharing of expenses and what the court will do.
For the past 6 years we have agreed to share costs 50/50 for hockey, soccer and summer camp (about $1000 total costs each year) because we have defined these as ordinary expenses and we have a 50/50 shared custody situation.
Now in court the Ex has decided she won't support these activities anymore financially. She says she will take the child but not pay for the activities.
Will the judge make her pay 50% or proportional to our incomes? Her income is zero because she quit her job because she is too depressed to work. So let's assume the judge agrees with her because if an income is imputed I know the result of proportional splitting expenses but really would like to know about 50/50 sharing of expenses and what the court will do.
Comment