2-2-5-5 should have been followed from the get-go, seemingly not worth chg >23 mths.
If the week-about schedule is working why change it to a 2-2-5-5. Sure, there are benefits to the 2-2-5-5 schedule. But, if you have week-about access and the children are the ages you stated and are doing well... Why change?
Effort of change is seemingly not worth it. In hindsight, should have proposed 2-2-5-5 from the beginning - especially in light of move.
If the week-about schedule is working why change it to a 2-2-5-5. Sure, there are benefits to the 2-2-5-5 schedule. But, if you have week-about access and the children are the ages you stated and are doing well... Why change?
Effort of change is seemingly not worth it. In hindsight, should have proposed 2-2-5-5 from the beginning - especially in light of move.
Comment