Ottawa Divorce .com Forums

User CP

New posts


  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > General Chat

General Chat This forum is for discussing anything that doesn't fit into another forum, or for discussing things that are off topic, or just for general venting.

Thread Tools
Old 02-27-2018, 12:12 PM
Tayken's Avatar
Tayken Tayken is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7,307
Tayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant future
Default Time to Change the Divorce Act?

Interesting article. Touches on what needs to change.

The CBA drew particular attention to the Divorce Acts silence on the issue of relocation, which it says has led to inconsistency in how the law is applied and significant unpredictability.

The landmark Supreme Court of Canada case of Gordon v. Goertz, which was decided in 1996, ruled that relocation decisions should be based on the best interests of the child.

But family lawyer Andrew Feldstein says the vagueness of the judgment makes it challenging to advise clients on relocation in Ontario, where case law is the only guide.
Excellent point and a much-needed change in the Divorce Act.

In addition, the CBA raises its concern about the inadequacy of the Divorce Act when it comes to child support in shared parenting arrangements, which have grown exponentially since the law was passed over three decades ago.

Again, the legislative void is currently filled by a Supreme Court decision, this time in the 2005 case of Contino v. Leonelli-Contino, when the nations top court ruled that judges must conduct a full and what lawyers say is an onerous analysis using the Child Support Guidelines.

While courts must retain jurisdiction to determine individual cases, providing a starting framework or formula for child support in shared parenting situations would help reduce conflict, increase stability and predictability, and lower the emotional and financial toll of litigation in this critical area, the CBA letter suggests.
I agree with the CBA 100%!

Bala says he would also like to see a linguistic revamp for the Act as part of any reforms to do away with terms such as custody and access.

These words evoke a proprietary if not a penal context, he says, noting that many judges already eschew them in favour of alternatives such as parenting time.
I agree. They are dated and should be dropped.

Good Luck!
Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Going through a terrible time accepting the Justice System PrincessKatie Divorce Support 11 06-26-2011 03:09 AM
Ex lied about divorce canuckbos General Chat 3 01-04-2011 08:49 PM
Its time to blow up divorce court - Toronto Sun - Sept 29, 2010 logicalvelocity Political Issues 4 10-19-2010 09:42 AM
need an advice before I will start divorce procedure Maby Financial Issues 1 05-26-2009 11:26 PM
Pending Divorce dickstacie Divorce & Family Law 1 09-05-2008 03:39 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:03 AM.