Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I'm in awe that this actually went to court
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by DowntroddenDad View PostI'm surprised costs were not awarded, this would seem to me to be the definition of frivolous.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tayken View PostCosts should have been ordered against both parties and all the lawyers involved. The fact that lawyers even took on this matter and brought forward and application for such nonsense is concerning. As officers of the court you would hope that professionals would simply refuse to take on such nonsense from their clients and refuse to represent them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DowntroddenDad View PostTo be honest, it sounded like an exercise that would have been done in my law class, and I think the prof would have failed anyone who said there was a case worthy of taking to court. But my course was decades ago, and perhaps we have gravitated slightly more to the US model of a litigious society.
Comment
-
Any lawyer taking on a case like this one is equal to an ''ambulance chaser''. Obviously in it for the $$$. I mean who gives a flying fluck about justice in this case? I know that one can get health insurance for dogs nowadays .... maybe now they will come up with doggie barristers lol!
Comment
-
Well I'm not surprised by this in the least. Just reading of all the squabbling that people particpate on this forum leads me to surmise that if you have money, a desire to act like an idiot in court, then there is most definitely a lawyer out there who will be your advocate and a judge who will hear your case.
Lawyers are merely guns-for-hire. Judges (who are lawyers) should be held accountable for hearing these sorts of cases. Both parties in this matter should have been assessed 'nonsense' fines IMO.
Judge should have his ass kicked off the bench for wasting tax dollars - he's probably a neighbour.Last edited by arabian; 05-24-2014, 09:53 PM.
Comment
Comment