I've found written proof in the motion transcripts that there is an error in how our access schedule is written in a temporary order. Because the father was obstructing mid week access and communication from the mother, the mother asked judge to order mid week access and daily communication to the kids 4 and 6. Judge bellowed out "1 hour visit Wed. 6-7". Mothers lawyer stated in transcripts how is this to take place when father won't allow mother onto the matramonial property (he's being a dick). The father piped up and said "she can pick the kids up from school". Judge had no problem with that.
Who types out these orders? Whom ever wrote it out in the temporary order provided the minimum and only wrote "1 hour visit Wed. 6-7".
The father won't allow me to pick up the kids from school making this mid week visit access in his eyes "too long".
Is this considered enough "material change" to go back and have the access schedule and temporary order reviewed and changed by a judge?
Who types out these orders? Whom ever wrote it out in the temporary order provided the minimum and only wrote "1 hour visit Wed. 6-7".
The father won't allow me to pick up the kids from school making this mid week visit access in his eyes "too long".
Is this considered enough "material change" to go back and have the access schedule and temporary order reviewed and changed by a judge?
Comment