The poster's original response to my questioning was sufficient. There was no need for him to go on and attack me personally (twice). Interesting that the thread talks about abduction and false accusations.
I found the OP's writing inconsistent. In one post he misspells a simple word such as "bare" [should have been "bear"] and generally writes simply with many grammatical errors. Then, a few posts later, he writes surprisingly well, in a polished professional-sounding manner which doesn't match previous posts.
I am interested in the subject and simply requested that if he is using a source that he provide [cite] it.
There was absolutely no need to attack me personally. (accusing me of drug/alcohol and then going on to say he feels sorry for my ex).
I found the OP's writing inconsistent. In one post he misspells a simple word such as "bare" [should have been "bear"] and generally writes simply with many grammatical errors. Then, a few posts later, he writes surprisingly well, in a polished professional-sounding manner which doesn't match previous posts.
I am interested in the subject and simply requested that if he is using a source that he provide [cite] it.
There was absolutely no need to attack me personally. (accusing me of drug/alcohol and then going on to say he feels sorry for my ex).
Comment