I had a Disclosure meeting with the OCL. They gave out their recommendations.
My current non Court Ordered or Court registered Agreement Custody is as follows,
He and She shall have Joint Custody of the Child. The Child shall primarily reside with Her, and He shall have Liberal Access upon reasonable notice to include;
alternate weekends- end of school Friday until Sunday at 5pm.
Every Monday after school until 7pm.
OCL Recommendation;
Joint Custody, Primarily resides with Her, Alternating weekends after school Friday until Monday till 7pm. Every Wednesday overnight to drop off at school on Thursday and Every Monday after school until 7pm.
Unless I am calculating this wrong its seems to be 50/50 but why not call it shared equal parenting? Why is She still primary residency if its 50/50. When the assessor disclosed their findings, there were no issues at all for both parties and the child enjoys both homes . Very positive feedback from assessor for both of us.
We tried to settle our differences with assessor but failed to do so. Now its back to court.
Please any feedback is appreciated.
My current non Court Ordered or Court registered Agreement Custody is as follows,
He and She shall have Joint Custody of the Child. The Child shall primarily reside with Her, and He shall have Liberal Access upon reasonable notice to include;
alternate weekends- end of school Friday until Sunday at 5pm.
Every Monday after school until 7pm.
OCL Recommendation;
Joint Custody, Primarily resides with Her, Alternating weekends after school Friday until Monday till 7pm. Every Wednesday overnight to drop off at school on Thursday and Every Monday after school until 7pm.
Unless I am calculating this wrong its seems to be 50/50 but why not call it shared equal parenting? Why is She still primary residency if its 50/50. When the assessor disclosed their findings, there were no issues at all for both parties and the child enjoys both homes . Very positive feedback from assessor for both of us.
We tried to settle our differences with assessor but failed to do so. Now its back to court.
Please any feedback is appreciated.
Comment