User CP
New posts
Advertising
|
Divorce & Family Law This forum is for discussing any of the legal issues involved in your divorce. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So I am being threatened by my ex, that he is going to have an order filed that states my child be returned to his jurisdiction (in NWO)
I am wondering if anyone has ever filed, or has had to return a child(ren) to the jurisdiction in which they had previously resided. I am not asking for judgement to be passed on me as I am not asking how to be told I'm right or wrong. I am asking for some insight. How long does one usually have after this motion has been filed. Can I protest it in court first? Or would I have to return to NWO to prove that being out west is in the best interest of my child? Any insight would be greatly appreciated. And if I see any "why would you move your child across the country?" I will just ignore it as I am making the smart choices to benefit my child as I see fit. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He can do it and you can be forced to return the child back. You dont have to move back if you dont want to.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
oh I will definitely move back as I have sole custody as my son and do not plan on taking a parenting hiatus at any point of his life. I will always be there for him. I guess my next move would be to have a court approve of a move for me to be out west. Do you also have any idea how much of a time frame is allowed between me being given the notice to return the child and when I have to be there?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
You may be getting worried over nothing. He is threatening to have a court order but it may just be a threat. How long ago did you move? What access agreements were in place and how to you plan to make up the access time lost (I am assuming an EOW father) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't have an experience on those motions, but I think it might depend on what type of motion he will file. If he files an emergency motion (I think thats what it is called) it might be sooner, if the child was removed from the jurisdiction without his consent. That is what I would have done and probably many more fathers, thats why I think he will probably do it as well. On time frames of this motion you could refer to court procedures guide.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I went to a lawyer before I left and he said that it would be harder for the father to make me come back that it would be for me to be approved a move. The father is not an EOW father but a "once or twice a month, maybe once every 3 months, depending on his mood and party schedule" kind of father. I have been gone from NWO for almost 7 months now. He did know we were leaving. But I had said that I was unsure if we would return at the end of summer or not (I initially returned home to spend time with family in both Manitoba and BC), and was exploring the possibility of returning to Alberta should I get a good job offer, which I did, and which leads us to where we are now.
He is claiming that I insisted I was returning even though I have emails stating that I said I was unsure if whether I would come back or not. He knew we were leaving NWO for over a month before our date of departure. Even when I came back to NWO to get some of my remaining things, he didn't make an effort to see his child. He has called his son twice in the last 7 months. He blames this on me due tot he fact that I didn't have a phone. But I still had skype (which he never set up, despite it being brought up) and I only was out of a phone for a month and a half. I really hope it is a threat because the quality of life for my son has improved vastly since moving back to AB. A safe neighborhood that has many kids his age, a wide selection of schools and activites, and better access to family members. (fathers family live in NWO also, but rarely made an effort to see my son, leaving him with less family there than he has now) Sorry for the long post, wanted to add some facts to the story. Also, I was granted sole custody March 2011 with reasonable access granted to the father. There is nothing specified in terms of mobility listed in our order. I know I am at fault for not having in writing, his consent for my move. But he is so hot/cold that I knew that even if he signed it, he could later twist it into a lie, that I forged his signature, etc. He is a pathological liar, "will do anything just to ruin my life, as he feels I ruined his by having this child. " his words, not mine. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is kind of hard for him to continue having a meaningful relationship with the child 3 provinces away.
Prior to your move you should have received your ex's written consent to the move. The lawyer gave you bad advice stating you should move as it is easier to beg forgiveness than ask permission. In matters of custody, this can only lead to a high conflict situation. You should have also been clear with your ex as to your intentions. You mentioned it may or may not be permanent. He sat on his hands until he found out it would be permanent and then took the appropriate action. Yes, he can get an order to have the child returned to their familiar location. If he was even semi-regular with his parenting time his chances of success are fairly good. You would have to argue that the change in location is in the childs best interests in that it: 1. offers you support of extended family; 2. better employment and income; and 3. better schools for the child. These are just a few things you will have to argue. You will also have to show how you are going to facilitate the childs relationship with the other parent. He should not be adversely affected by your unilateral decision to move. That means, he shouldn't lose out on his parenting time and he shouldn't be forced to pay the increased costs of exercising his parenting time. Are you will to: a. Give up all of summer and each March break and 1/2 of christmas break so that your ex may have parenting time? b. Waive C/S payments in lieu of him accepting the increased costs of transportation to exercise his parenting time or will you fly the child back and forth on your dime? c. What form of communications will you make available to facilitate the childs relationship? Skype, phone etc... The precedent for moving the child is Gordon v Goertz. You can look it up on Canlii. But you will have to prove that the move is in the childs best interests. Now, if you get a substantially better job, a more stable environment etc., that could be found to be in the childs best interests. But you will need to argue that these trump the childs right to a meaningful relationship with their other parent. |
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Unless you have written consent from the other parent you will have to provide significant evidence on a prima facia basis that the move was done within the children's "best interests". Quote:
Please see the following threads regarding possible results of the conduct you are describing and what could and possibly should be ordered against you: http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...shoping-12010/ http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...ase-law-12665/ http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...duction-11646/ Quote:
If you left with consent then his claims are of no merit and wouldn't be heard by the court. Time is of the essence for the left behind parent to have the children removed to their habitual residence. Every day they do not act in the matter is a day marked against them in their claim. My advice to the left behind parent would be to file immediately and on an emergency ex-parte basis depending on how the children were removed from their habitual residence. Quote:
What you are possibly doing is known as "forum shopping" and justices are very educated on the conduct of highly conflicted litigants who jump jurisdiction to gain an advantage in a custody and access dispute. Quote:
Hopefully the other parent is smart enough to be scanning the internet to find your posting and be able to provide it to law enforcement to demonstrate intent. I am willing to work with law enforcement and the left behind parent in the event they find this thread in assisting in the successful return of the children in question to their habitual residence in the event the removal of the children in question was done to establish a false "status quo". Parental abduction in contravention of CCC 282.(1) and the CLRA is a serious offense and is not looked upon lightly by the court and you are seriously putting your custody and access to the children in question if you have made this move unilaterally. Good Luck! Tayken Last edited by Tayken; 10-05-2012 at 08:46 PM. |
#10
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Honesty would be working out the details with the other parent and not being "vague" if you were returning. Your story is wrought with deceptive comments, terminology and claims often made by highly conflicted people who "forum shop" like this to eliminate the other parent from the child's life. I wish you no luck in your efforts and all luck to the left behind parent who hopefully will seek legal counsel and the return of the child in question to their habitual residence. Good luck to the left behind parent, Tayken |
![]() |
Tags |
jurisdiction, mobility, relocation |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spousal/Child Support Question | Jenny | Divorce & Family Law | 6 | 10-01-2013 12:01 AM |
Motion filed - What do I do? | Fresh Starts | Divorce & Family Law | 5 | 05-18-2010 03:46 PM |
Email from my Lawyer - ???? | serrona | Divorce & Family Law | 4 | 11-24-2006 12:58 PM |
aftermath | littleman | Divorce & Family Law | 1 | 09-27-2006 09:43 PM |
The Concept: Standard of living | gooddadgoingmad | Divorce & Family Law | 7 | 02-20-2006 10:59 PM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:08 AM.