godknowsthe truth,
:"THIS COURT ORDERS THAT the Respondent shall take out life insurance in the amount of $ 50,000, naming (children) as his beneficiaries".
That is a clear order to me. I would take the matter back to the court by way of a case conference and possibly contempt motion.
Let him explain it to the Judge his game playing.
Seems to me the Judge was specific in the order as with my suggestion as whomever is the guardian of the children if they are minors would control the intent of the proceeds of the life insurance.
Keep in mind that support orders bind estates as listed in the family law act Ontario. You do have this protection, but creditors I think would have an equal binding. There may not be enough estate left to support the children.
I would get this straightened out through the courts and seek costs as to me he is acting in bad faith
:"THIS COURT ORDERS THAT the Respondent shall take out life insurance in the amount of $ 50,000, naming (children) as his beneficiaries".
That is a clear order to me. I would take the matter back to the court by way of a case conference and possibly contempt motion.
Let him explain it to the Judge his game playing.
Seems to me the Judge was specific in the order as with my suggestion as whomever is the guardian of the children if they are minors would control the intent of the proceeds of the life insurance.
Keep in mind that support orders bind estates as listed in the family law act Ontario. You do have this protection, but creditors I think would have an equal binding. There may not be enough estate left to support the children.
I would get this straightened out through the courts and seek costs as to me he is acting in bad faith
Comment