I am self-rep. I put forth a Motion to Change my current order to seek 50/50 parenting schedule from a 60/40 parenting schedule. Opposing party responded no, which is no surprise.
Opposing party is pushing for Parenting Coordination. Why go this route if they did not consent to the Motion to Change? What is the difference between pleading my case to a Judge (displaying the best interests of the children) and pleading my case to a Lawyer/Parenting Coordinator?
Will it be frowned upon if I don't go through Parenting Coordination?
Also, is it frowned upon if I choose not to have the children involved in VOC at this point in time? All points to control and manipulation from opposing party, which can be proven (example, other parent cannot care for child due to work schedule, so grandma does all the caring... while I should be the first option).
Opposing party is pushing for Parenting Coordination. Why go this route if they did not consent to the Motion to Change? What is the difference between pleading my case to a Judge (displaying the best interests of the children) and pleading my case to a Lawyer/Parenting Coordinator?
Will it be frowned upon if I don't go through Parenting Coordination?
Also, is it frowned upon if I choose not to have the children involved in VOC at this point in time? All points to control and manipulation from opposing party, which can be proven (example, other parent cannot care for child due to work schedule, so grandma does all the caring... while I should be the first option).
Comment