Ok so ex and I have exchanged offers to settle. On custody we basically agree to 50 / 50, but her offer to settle is written in that I have to agree to ALL the Parts under Custody and Access or none.
I agree to everything except she one sub-part says "the children's primary residence shall be with the mother" and she will hold all the children's documentation.
In 50 / 50 I feel that residence is equally with both parties and therefore "primary residence" has no meaning and it should be the boundries of the jurisdiction the children live in?
My lawyer says that Primary Residence doesn't really mean anything other then from a tax perspective she may be able to claim both children as dependents. Since after 17 months I'm getting 99% that I should except the whole part and at least put custody to bed.
But she's been a dog with bone on this "Primary Residence" thing for the last 17 months so I just feel like there is something more.
So anyone know what the definition of Primary Residence is and what does this give her in a shared custody arrangement that she wants so badly???
I agree to everything except she one sub-part says "the children's primary residence shall be with the mother" and she will hold all the children's documentation.
In 50 / 50 I feel that residence is equally with both parties and therefore "primary residence" has no meaning and it should be the boundries of the jurisdiction the children live in?
My lawyer says that Primary Residence doesn't really mean anything other then from a tax perspective she may be able to claim both children as dependents. Since after 17 months I'm getting 99% that I should except the whole part and at least put custody to bed.
But she's been a dog with bone on this "Primary Residence" thing for the last 17 months so I just feel like there is something more.
So anyone know what the definition of Primary Residence is and what does this give her in a shared custody arrangement that she wants so badly???
Comment