We got a letter from the opposing lawyer the other day asking that my fiancé provide at least 50% payment for expenses that are not listed in Section 7. The lawyer and my stepson's mom have deemed them extraordinary expenses because they do not feel that my fiancé is paying enough in child support, based on an imputed income of $28,000 despite having an income of less than $20,000 on EI, and therefore those expenses "cannot reasonably be covered by child support."
WTF?!
They are planning on withholding documents/materials until we provide the payments for them. Thankfully, we do not need those documents/materials at this time, but we'd like unrestricted access to them in the future. Can they really (and legally) play such childish games?
Oh, and the kicker... the judge at our last conference recommended (though unfortunately did not put it in writing as she thought it was common sense) that the child's documents travel with him during access/vacation visits, without any financial demands in order to receive access to such documents.
WTF?!
They are planning on withholding documents/materials until we provide the payments for them. Thankfully, we do not need those documents/materials at this time, but we'd like unrestricted access to them in the future. Can they really (and legally) play such childish games?
Oh, and the kicker... the judge at our last conference recommended (though unfortunately did not put it in writing as she thought it was common sense) that the child's documents travel with him during access/vacation visits, without any financial demands in order to receive access to such documents.
Comment