Originally posted by Janus
View Post
First, the judge has to answer the question about imputing income. If income is imputed, I will argue the expenses are ordinary and shared 50/50. If not, I will argue they are still ordinary and be paid by her 100% since I pay full table CS.
It is up to her to prove they are s7 which I will use case law to debate citing the costs do not exceed what can be reasonably covered. If she is getting full CS, the costs are reasonable If she is imputed and getting offset CS, 50% of the costs are reasonable. I will also debate the 6 year status quo where we have agreed the expenses were not s7 and shared 50/50 and that there is no MCIC to warrant a change.
Comment