Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

lies, lies, lies.

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    )
    Last edited by mummer1962; 07-08-2011, 07:44 PM. Reason: oopps wrong case law

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by blinkandimgone View Post
      What...the eff....is wrong with you?
      CanLII - 2007 ONCA 126 (CanLII)

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by mummer1962 View Post
        Which has *absolutely* NOTHING to do with what the eff is wrong with you postgasming nonsensical thoughts all over the board in multiple threads. Srsly...stop.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by blinkandimgone View Post
          Which has *absolutely* NOTHING to do with what the eff is wrong with you postgasming nonsensical thoughts all over the board in multiple threads. Srsly...stop.
          Oh yes it does if you can read and comprehend what i am saying obviously you cant. This case law has to do with what was quoted by a JUDGE as to what he has to do...so you know more than a judge...good luck. blink and BE GONE.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by mummer1962 View Post
            Oh yes it does if you can read and comprehend what i am saying obviously you cant. This case law has to do with what was quoted by a JUDGE as to what he has to do...so you know more than a judge...good luck. blink and BE GONE.
            Just read the case you linked to.... You're obviously smoking rope again.

            Cheers!

            Gary

            Comment


            • #21
              The caes I linked to says that respondent has to pay benefits to adult child. Cited by judge...read further

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by mummer1962 View Post
                The caes I linked to says that respondent has to pay benefits to adult child. Cited by judge...read further
                No it doesn't. It doesn't even come close to saying anything even remotely close to that.

                Before you go beaking off about others' reading ability, methinks you need to polish your own.

                Put down the hookah and get thee to a skool.

                Cheers!

                Gary

                Comment


                • #23
                  OH yeah you are the man..guess what we are all fighting for our children, I make 57k a year...i can support my child unfortunaley i have to put in my spouses inccome for OSAP,,, ,aka ...bio dad had to put in his inomce too..140 k. i would like nothing better than my child support herself however i need to teach her that you are what you marry...thus teaching her not to marry an asss .....according to the law he has to pay....hope you dont have daugters....because i chose a spouse that makes good money bio dad is trying to renage on his responsibilies,,,i teach my daughters to support themselves not depend on a man..l.
                  Last edited by mummer1962; 07-08-2011, 09:12 PM. Reason: becaue i can

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    obviously you are not a judge

                    Second, the benefit is not income of the appellant in the sense that he redirects it to his son simply as a matter of convenience. Instead, the Act treats the benefit as that of the child, not that of the contributor. Paragraph 44(1)(e) of the Act specifically provides that “a disabled contributor’s child benefit shall be paid to each child of a disabled contributor…”. As well, an application for the benefit is not made by the parent, but by the parent “on behalf of” the child. This is confirmed by s. 75, which provides that the benefit is payable directly to the child, unless the child is a minor, in which case the benefit is paid to the custodial parent. The appellant has no entitlement to the benefit, he has no control over its payment, it is not taxable in his hands, and it is not included in his income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation. Accordingly, it should not be used to reduce the appellant’s obligation to pay support for his child.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      [78 I require Mr. Shrek to apply to add S to the dependents who are entitled to receive payments under his Veterans Disability Pension Plan. If S is found to be entitled to receive benefits under this plan, such payments shall not reduce Mr. Shrek's obligation to pay child support. (See Sipos v. Sipos, 2007 ONCA 293.)
                      names changed obviously
                      (78)

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by mummer1962 View Post
                        Oh yes it does if you can read and comprehend what i am saying obviously you cant. This case law has to do with what was quoted by a JUDGE as to what he has to do...so you know more than a judge...good luck. blink and BE GONE.
                        I do believe you are quite confused. Nobody can understand what you're saying because most of your posts are so random and illogical. There is no case law anywhere related to my earlier comment as it was in reference to your plethora of posts in every thread and the ridiculousness of it. Unless of course a judge took the time to point it out to you as well. For a "professioanl ", it seems you need a lot of things dumbed down for you before you get it.

                        Oh...and I guess Dad supporting the child's education is only obligatory when it's *your* child, hmm?

                        http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...ditation-3551/
                        Last edited by blinkandimgone; 07-09-2011, 01:23 AM. Reason: lol

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by blinkandimgone View Post
                          I do believe you are quite confused. Nobody can understand what you're saying because most of your posts are so random and illogical. There is no case law anywhere related to my earlier comment as it was in reference to your plethora of posts in every thread and the ridiculousness of it. Unless of course a judge took the time to point it out to you as well. For a "professioanl ", it seems you need a lot of things dumbed down for you before you get it.

                          Oh...and I guess Dad supporting the child's education is only obligatory when it's *your* child, hmm?

                          http://www.ottawadivorce.com/forum/f...ditation-3551/
                          LOL looks like you got her there. Doesnt matter a couple of posts down that she said they were going to help anyways (i dont believe that). If they were going to help anyways then why post on a board to find out if they are obligated to do it. She has one set of rules for her ex and one set for herself.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by mummer1962 View Post
                            Thank you Epona, I am moving on...my friend is from the Newfoundland Status of Women and she is interested in my case.
                            ummmm, this is not moving on. This is trying to keep sticking it to the ex. Let it go and you will be a happier person. This whole revenge thing is getting tiresome.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Ha Ha Ha Ha.

                              Mummer is a whacko and telling her that doesn't do any good because - well - she's a whacko

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by dadtotheend View Post
                                Ha Ha Ha Ha.

                                Mummer is a whacko and telling her that doesn't do any good because - well - she's a whacko
                                No, no, no...she's a "professioanl"!

                                Comment

                                Our Divorce Forums
                                Forums dedicated to helping people all across Canada get through the separation and divorce process, with discussions about legal issues, parenting issues, financial issues and more.
                                Working...
                                X