The clause reads as follows:
"The party removing the children shall provide the other with general information pertaining to his/her departure, including addresses and telephones where the children will be staying and a travel itinerary and copies of air tickets if travel by air is involved. The parties shall not require letters of permission in order to leave Canada with the children."
I am not sure why this information can not be shared. I've received no information whatsoever.
It would be pointless addressing any breach of the court order after the fact. Why would I pursue this matter in court after the fact? To what effect? Its not going to help the children much if Dad has to go to court for breaching his own court order?
Slug head, it may come as a surprise to you, but some of us actually prefer not to go to court unless it is "absolutely" necessary.
It is easier just to try and comply with the court order.
"The party removing the children shall provide the other with general information pertaining to his/her departure, including addresses and telephones where the children will be staying and a travel itinerary and copies of air tickets if travel by air is involved. The parties shall not require letters of permission in order to leave Canada with the children."
I am not sure why this information can not be shared. I've received no information whatsoever.
It would be pointless addressing any breach of the court order after the fact. Why would I pursue this matter in court after the fact? To what effect? Its not going to help the children much if Dad has to go to court for breaching his own court order?
Slug head, it may come as a surprise to you, but some of us actually prefer not to go to court unless it is "absolutely" necessary.
It is easier just to try and comply with the court order.
Comment