"I filed a consent order reflecting the access agreement that was
reached at our last Court appearance. I received a letter from Mr.
*lawyers name*stating he is very upset that I did so, arguing that his client
only agreed to "try" the access arrangement and did not intend to be
bound by it. He has asked me to consent to vacating that order. I am
not inclined to do so as I feel it accurately reflects what was put on
the record in court. For them to commit to cooperating with access and
then refusing to be bound by that agreement is in itself extremely
misleading. I will take your instructions on whether or not you want
to consent to vacating the access order ( meaning it will be "erased.")."
Above is the exact email I received from my lawyer today. I understand what she is saying yet I'm not sure what the implications are. The background is that I toook ex to court two months ago and she is not cooperating with my seeing my son. What REALLY is my lawyer saying according to this?
Any help would be so very appreciated/!!!
Serrona
reached at our last Court appearance. I received a letter from Mr.
*lawyers name*stating he is very upset that I did so, arguing that his client
only agreed to "try" the access arrangement and did not intend to be
bound by it. He has asked me to consent to vacating that order. I am
not inclined to do so as I feel it accurately reflects what was put on
the record in court. For them to commit to cooperating with access and
then refusing to be bound by that agreement is in itself extremely
misleading. I will take your instructions on whether or not you want
to consent to vacating the access order ( meaning it will be "erased.")."
Above is the exact email I received from my lawyer today. I understand what she is saying yet I'm not sure what the implications are. The background is that I toook ex to court two months ago and she is not cooperating with my seeing my son. What REALLY is my lawyer saying according to this?
Any help would be so very appreciated/!!!
Serrona
Comment