Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Karma really is a b@#ch

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Karma really is a b@#ch

    Just watching the Dr Phil show, and a 67yr odd yr old woman who admits that her first marriage of 12yrs was not for love, and then went on again to marry a guy she met in the hospital for 42yrs and admits again that she wasn't really in love with him (he died and she inherited all his stuff), is now getting a taste of her own medicine.

    She has been sending money since early 2014 to a guy (she has never met), who goes by the name Aaron and claims to live in Missouri, with her living in Illinois. They've spoken on the phone, and he always claims to be traveling. She has sent him $200k to date...sold her house and all belongings.

    Imagine the poor smug now that is going to get bamboozled by this woman, only because she will claim to love him and bang him It's scary to think there are many like her out there, just looking to take advantage i.e. to recoup from someone else

  • #2
    Well 42 years of being married to someone is something don't you think? Do you not feel she was entitled to inherit his stuff? What does "being in love" have to do with anything? Had she died first he would have likely inherited all of her "stuff."

    Simply math puts the woman at 13 yrs of age at her first marriage.
    Last edited by arabian; 04-30-2015, 06:58 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      the 67 yrs odd in the original post shows that the exact age was in doubt. Part 2 of the show today on Dr Phil....the show tried to find this person she is in love with, and has been sending money to.

      It should be a goodie. This is obviously a payback of some sort. She was also nasty on the show to her late husband's daughter, calling her a b#$ch so may times and telling her to shut up. She said the same to Dr Phil and the audience...imagine being married to this piece of work.

      Many like her out there, just in it for what they can get

      Comment


      • #4
        I understand that in the land of sensationalistic daytime television shows the producers of the show want to evoke watcher's emotions to ensure high ratings.
        I get that.

        What I don't understand is how you can surmise that someone in a long-term marriage (42 years is definitely long term) is greedy and that, because she isn't a nice person on television, she deserves to be ripped off by a scam artist.

        Comment


        • #5
          In her own words..."she didn't care for the ex husband (42 yr marriage)", but it was convenient. Now think how many false marriages like this there is out there...although many won't admit it.

          You ought to tune in today to see this woman for yourself.

          Comment


          • #6
            And perhaps he felt the same and was content with the arrangement. They both had the companionship and support of the other, whether or not the family or others were happy about it or agreed with it, it is nobody's business.

            Comment


            • #7
              Nobody runs a 42 year long money scam. Something kept the two together... she may have looked at it differently after he died and had time to think about (review their life together).

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by serendipitous View Post


                Many like her out there, just in it for what they can get
                Being greedy and unreasonable is not gender specific. Hopefully a judge will see right through people like that.
                judge-504x400.jpg

                Comment

                Our Divorce Forums
                Forums dedicated to helping people all across Canada get through the separation and divorce process, with discussions about legal issues, parenting issues, financial issues and more.
                Working...
                X