Well the Judge bought her sell job and feels that I am controlling, so she ordered sole custody. There was no new evidence from the motion she filed and lost so can I appeal stating that the Judge erred because she based her opinion on my desire to communicate with a restrictive, controlling Ex who manipulated the access of the children from their Father and their communciation with him? The judge made a decision not based on evidence, but on her opinion...this is not Justice
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
She was awarded Sole Custody, time to appeal...help?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by riverbag View PostWell the Judge bought her sell job and feels that I am controlling, so she ordered sole custody.
-
Controlling?!
The Judge saw my holding my ex accountable for not taking them to the doctor when they were sick, expecting her to feed my daughter something other than "Vanilla Ice Cream and Lucky Charms", not giving my oldest a chocolate bar with peanuts when my youngest has a peanut allergy, my wanting to go to my oldest's dance class on non access nights....etc.
The Judge states that no parent may impose their will on another Parent in the lives of the children, yes my ex imposed her will by taking them and rstricting my communication with them. The court allowed her to do this with no just reason and the length of time enabled her to create an environment of "stability" that the Judge was not comfortable changing. It's a joke and I'm not sure what to do except to appeal, but I have to prove the judge erred in law, so now I have to find the err
Comment
-
Originally posted by riverbag View PostThe Judge saw my holding my ex accountable for not taking them to the doctor when they were sick, expecting her to feed my daughter something other than "Vanilla Ice Cream and Lucky Charms", not giving my oldest a chocolate bar with peanuts when my youngest has a peanut allergy, my wanting to go to my oldest's dance class on non access nights....etc.
The Judge states that no parent may impose their will on another Parent in the lives of the children, yes my ex imposed her will by taking them and rstricting my communication with them. The court allowed her to do this with no just reason and the length of time enabled her to create an environment of "stability" that the Judge was not comfortable changing. It's a joke and I'm not sure what to do except to appeal, but I have to prove the judge erred in law, so now I have to find the err
That totally doesn't make any sense. I know you are not suppose to try to control what goes on at the other parents house. But sometimes we have concerns though not life threatening except for the nut allergy incident and express ( guess depends on how we do it I guess) I think there are way worse controlling parents out there that get away with alot worse than what you have described.
I dont understand....
Comment
-
Originally posted by tugofwar View PostThat totally doesn't make any sense. I know you are not suppose to try to control what goes on at the other parents house. But sometimes we have concerns though not life threatening except for the nut allergy incident and express ( guess depends on how we do it I guess) I think there are way worse controlling parents out there that get away with alot worse than what you have described.
I dont understand....
Comment
-
This is SOO familiar.
Looks like the judge has rationalized it using statements regarding 'mom's behaviour to kids' and 'dad's behaviour to mom'.
That judge should be forced to include in her/his reasoning statements regarding 1) 'dad's behaviour to kids' and 2) 'mom's behaviour to dad'.
But we know the answers why i.e. 1) Cannot possibly be in same league as mom, and 2) Will never be held accountable.
Obviously, since not a lawyer, and don't know full details I can't give an opinion on whether appeal is wise or not, but jeez, this doesn't sound right.Last edited by dinkyface; 12-19-2010, 03:59 PM.
Comment
-
The Judge felt that I was overbearing and controlling, yet all my contact was with the children. I would call my oldest every day she wasn't with me, after her Mother agreed via e-mail (submitted in trial). I went to my daughters activities, whether they were on my access nights or not. I never interfered with my ex. I expected my Ex to take them to the Dr when they were sick (She didn't do this and I submitted evidence that she didn't). The Judge felt I was trying to hold my ex to my standards of Parenting. None of this is controlling or overbearing as she has the right to make her decsuions and she still does, without any backlash or interference from me, I simply make my wishes felt, am I wrong to want the children cared for?
My biggest issue is the following statement made by the Judge "No Parent may interfere or disrupt the relationship of the other Parent with the children" She used this against me!! Yet my Ex took the children, used to them to force me from our home and held them hostage throughout the entire legal process, yet because I wanted a shared Parenting agreement and tried to stay involved with the children in a manner in which they were accustomed (My Ex admitted I spent more time with them before the separation), I'm controlling and overbearing....how does that seem accurate, or even close to fair and just?
Comment
-
I did present the positives of my interaction with the children, my taking them to the doctor, activities, play dates, specialist appointments, play groups....all of this was thrown back in my face as some form of "competition with the children's Mother". I was depicted as someone who was trying to be better than the Mother by doing these things and then submitting them in trial.
Comment
-
LV, I requested Shared Parenting (2-2-3) as I thought I had enough proof to show that we could communicate when she wanted to, but she just controlled the communication. She shouldn't be able to control communication and then say we can't, that's not correct. She has been asking for Sole all along.
Comment
-
I'm not trying to trash you here but if you're looking for explantions from your internet friends who know virtually nothing about your family...
Was there a status quo that had the kids living primarily with Mom throughout the legal proceedings? Rightly or wrongly, that would have been a huge determinant of custody. Indeed the status quo is probably the most important consideration.
Presenting literally hundreds of emails that denounce Mom's controlling nature smells very fishy. It sounds like that may have backfired and made you look a little obsessive.
So does calling your eldest every night she wasn't with you. That statement about interfering with the other parent may have evolved from too much calling when the kids were with Mom. Again, just guessing based on limited information.
Positives about the children don't just include taking them to the doctor, play dates etc. It sounds like the judge, rightly or wrongly, perceived that your involvement was strategic. Saying that you were in a competition with Mom gives the impression that the judge thinks you read the manual and were trying to go toe to toe with her on custody determinants.
If that status quo was operating against you leading up to trial, then I hazard that the judge found you two to be in high conflict and that joint custody/shared parenting was not going to work. Someone had to be awarded sole cusody. Had the kids been with you primarily leading up to trial, the ruling may well have gone your way. Again, status quo is sooo important.
I've not really been a CanLii guy around here, but I would be interested in reading the judge's decision when it gets posted up. If you want to share the link, I'm guessing that others will too.
Comment
Comment