Originally posted by Janus
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Links re: ejaculation and abortion
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by arabian View Post1) no. If you give up a child for a legal adoption you give up rights to child and person adopting child assumes responsibilities for the child.
Parents are financially responsible for their children, isn't that a universal rule?
So, to reiterate, why would adoption be any different? Would it not be better for the child if the biological mother (and father) remained financially obligated to the adoptive family?
2) I think you confuse abandoning a child with adoption? In any case, if you go after one parent it would seem to me to be only fair to go after the other parent as well.
So, do you support safe haven laws?
If we had such laws, wouldn't it be better for the children to track down the parents and make sure they pay the appropriate amount of child support?
Comment
-
Let's be clear, if you are fired from a job for unjust cause you are obligated to mitigate the damages by seeking employment.
If an accident happens (and really aren't both parties at fault) then as a unit they should attempt to mitigate their damages. Failure to do so is bad faith.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Links17 View PostLet's be clear, if you are fired from a job for unjust cause you are obligated to mitigate the damages by seeking employment.
If an accident happens (and really aren't both parties at fault) then as a unit they should attempt to mitigate their damages. Failure to do so is bad faith.
At any rate, I think adoption clearly transfers not only the privilege of parenthood, but the responsibilities. The adoptive parents are freely taking on 100% of the joys and trials of parenting the child and the biological parents have given that up and no longer have those rights or responsibilities, often to the benefit of the child if the natural parents are unable or unwilling to raise a child in the way they feel the child deserves.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Links17 View PostLet's be clear, if you are fired from a job for unjust cause you are obligated to mitigate the damages by seeking employment.
If an accident happens (and really aren't both parties at fault) then as a unit they should attempt to mitigate their damages. Failure to do so is bad faith.
In family court it is simple: you pay to play
Comment
-
Except that it is present not just in employment law...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitigation_%28law%29
Comment
-
Originally posted by Links17 View PostExcept that it is present not just in employment law...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitigation_%28law%29
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Newfie76 View PostYup...most women I know admit through their actions that they are out to trap men.....I married one.
Even if women were out to "trap men" - it isn't because they are women, it's because social construct and life experience has made them that way.... If you could spread your legs and have guys running to pay your bills and stuff, could you actually say you would never do it.....
Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Newfie76 View PostYup...most women I know admit through their actions that they are out to trap men.....I married one.
This is such incredibly simplistic thinking (this thread).
Big boys and girls have sex and have to deal with the outcome. period.
Comment
Comment