Originally posted by Tayken
View Post
Here is some interesting part from actual article...(emphasis are added)
[Additional background to the case: the story follows a familiar pattern. In this instance, Ryoko Fukuda, the Japanese mother, made a charge of domestic violence and swore out an order of protection to keep the father, Arnold-Carlo Delizo away from his child.Upon investigation, the court found this charge of violence to be false and ordered a shared residential schedule and parenting plan for the child to divide time between both parents. Although Fukuda claimed that the father "chose not to see his child," the court found that "Fukuda withheld the child from Delizo for a protracted time without just cause.” Fukuda contended that the final residential schedule was "outside the bounds of reasonable choices. In particular, she objected to….joint decision making.” A father actually having a part in decisions regarding his child is outside the bounds of reasonable choice according to this mother. One find this to be a typical part of the abductors' mentality in nearly every case. ]
Comment