Of course I have advice: Why lie? You did not edit to fix a spelling error, you edited to add your further comments. I can post your original if necessary, but I think you'll concur with this statement.
You attacked my character when you directed your derogatory comment specifically towards me. If I see you doing something similar to any other poster, I’ll delete your post(s).
I ran the “fairly common clause” by a couple of people today that regularly draft separation agreements because now I’m curious about this mobility clause you are insistent on [although you already have an interim motion that confirms status quo remains in your area and can not be moved?], and they advised out-of-country is automatic, provincial not so much. And as several others have also noted in this thread, exiting the province doesn’t seem noteworthy. I certainly don’t think it is a given.
And, btw, re: favourable government studies on government programs – well… that is sort of what they do, isn’t it?
You attacked my character when you directed your derogatory comment specifically towards me. If I see you doing something similar to any other poster, I’ll delete your post(s).
I ran the “fairly common clause” by a couple of people today that regularly draft separation agreements because now I’m curious about this mobility clause you are insistent on [although you already have an interim motion that confirms status quo remains in your area and can not be moved?], and they advised out-of-country is automatic, provincial not so much. And as several others have also noted in this thread, exiting the province doesn’t seem noteworthy. I certainly don’t think it is a given.
And, btw, re: favourable government studies on government programs – well… that is sort of what they do, isn’t it?
Comment