Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Divorce & Family Law

Divorce & Family Law This forum is for discussing any of the legal issues involved in your divorce.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-10-2009, 05:58 AM
Kimberley's Avatar
Kimberley Kimberley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 477
Kimberley is on a distinguished road
Exclamation B.C court bars mother from seeing daughter

I read this story this morning and thought I would post it for everyone.

Quote:




VANCOUVER, B.C. - In a case of extreme parental alienation, a mother has been banned by a B.C. Supreme Court judge from seeing her teenage daughter for more than a year.
Because of the urgency of the matter, Justice Donna Martinson issued the terse, two-page ruling outlining 15 conditions the parents must follow, including that the mother, known only as Ms. A, not see her daughter until at least March 31, 2010.
The decision came after the mother alleged extreme emotional abuse by the father, which she claimed was putting the teen's safety at risk.
"I am satisfied that Ms. A's allegations are unfounded," Martinson wrote. "I am further satisfied that she has continued to undermine the relationship between M and her father and has acted in ways that are detrimental to M's psychological healing."
Names have been stripped from the court ruling to protect the girl's identity.
The judge has ordered that both the mother and maternal grandmother have no contact with the girl, which would be enforced by police if necessary.
The court has also ordered the mother to pay $320 per month for the girl's counselling, on top of the child support she is already paying.
Jessica Ko, the lawyer for the girl's father, said it's been a gruelling road for the dad who has been in court 17 different times to gain access to his daughter or defend himself against the mother's allegations.
"It went to the point where our client was essentially bankrupt from defending himself and pursuing this legal matter," said Ko.
She said the father is in a highly respected profession and should be able to recover financially.
Ko said the ruling banning the mother from any contact with the child was extremely unusual, because often the court attempts to find a balance in access between the parents.
"This is a case where there was found to be an extreme example of parental alienation by the mother towards the father."
  #2  
Old 03-11-2009, 01:08 AM
dadtotheend's Avatar
dadtotheend dadtotheend is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,644
dadtotheend will become famous soon enoughdadtotheend will become famous soon enough
Default

Wow, there's another one. This gives hope to alienated parents. Rock on Canadian justices!
  #3  
Old 03-11-2009, 09:47 AM
AtALoss AtALoss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 560
AtALoss is on a distinguished road
Default

I am just glad to see that there is getting some ackowledgement to this issue. The way I see it is that can happen from either side. Utimately it is unfair to the child and they are the one who is hurt by this kind of behaviour from a parent.
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
first time through court for custody Kevin_Hill88 Divorce & Family Law 39 09-24-2011 09:16 AM
Interesting Case karmaseeker Divorce & Family Law 4 05-10-2011 08:03 PM
Will the Court order a weekend change??? monksamillion Divorce & Family Law 16 04-28-2010 04:54 PM
Shared parenting, Status quo, Imputing income, Court costs & Protection form ex lies Underdog Divorce & Family Law 7 04-03-2010 06:39 AM
notification of court action willowtree Introductions 0 12-21-2009 11:36 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:44 AM.