I'm in the process of writing our Case Conference Brief - to be served and filed in a couple of days. We have already received the opposing lawyer's brief, which is fairly short and says throughout that no reduction in CS is necessary, and that instead in should be increased. (Yes, because that makes perfect sense when the payor lost his job.)
Anyhow, as we are the moving party in this case, we are including many reasons in our Brief, all of which are true.
I'm just wondering if it's worth our time and trouble to attach exhibits (proof) to support our reasoning. I don't want the Brief to be overwhelming - it is already quite lengthy. Plus, we are going to have all supporting documentation with us in court in case the judge questions something.
We are leaning towards the latter... as many of our reasons are simply common sense, or we do not have adequate documentation to attach as proof. Plus, I'm following the same format that our lawyer used when he made wrote and filed our Brief in a previous court case.
But I'm just wondering what you'd suggest?
Anyhow, as we are the moving party in this case, we are including many reasons in our Brief, all of which are true.
I'm just wondering if it's worth our time and trouble to attach exhibits (proof) to support our reasoning. I don't want the Brief to be overwhelming - it is already quite lengthy. Plus, we are going to have all supporting documentation with us in court in case the judge questions something.
We are leaning towards the latter... as many of our reasons are simply common sense, or we do not have adequate documentation to attach as proof. Plus, I'm following the same format that our lawyer used when he made wrote and filed our Brief in a previous court case.
But I'm just wondering what you'd suggest?
Comment